Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$528kAnimals$437kReligion$363kHuman Services$338kYouth Development$289kEducation$286kFood & Nutrition$249kHousing & Shelter$211kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $430k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION$75,000
IVY TECH FOUNDATION$59,000
PAWS & CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER INC$37,000
SALVATION ARMY$35,000
SAGAMORE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS$34,000
LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY$30,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$30,000
LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF$27,750
THE BRANCH WESLEYAN CHURCH$25,000
YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH$25,000
THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC$20,000
ASSN FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENGINEERING$20,000
SEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$20,000
BAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC$20,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$19,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $455k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $44k → 9%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $25k → 9%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $10k → 16%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $25k → 9%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $10k → 16%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $25k → 9%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $25k → 9%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $35k → 19%YMCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $31k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $30k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $27k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $21k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $21k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $20k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $20k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $19k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $18k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $16k → 19%THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $13k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $11k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $4k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $2k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $2k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 32 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
10

Total granted

$3.1M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-9%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    PAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $290k · revenue +44% · 42% of their budget
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $208k · revenue +34%
  • YC
    YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $144k · revenue +419%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue -9%
  • SC
    SAGAMORE COUNCIL BOY SCOUNTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Clinton County Inc

To provide for the humane treatment of animals in clinton county, indiana

Animals
2
Dekalb Humane Society Inc

The organization provides a safe shelter for animals until they can be adopted into a lifelong home. the organization supports local law enforcement departments in animal abuse and neglect cases, works with animal rescue groups and…

Animals
3
Humane Indiana Inc

To lead the community in the humane treatment of animals.

Animals
4
Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc

Humane treatment of stray dogs and cats

Animals
5
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
6
Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc

To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment
8
Humane Society of Scott County

The humane society of scott county provides humane care for all lost, abandoned and unwanted pets in scott county, to adopt these pets to caring, responsible, life-long homes, and to educate the community about responsible pet ownership.

Animals
9
Laporte County Habitat for Humanity

The purpose of the organization is to build houses for families who are financially distressed. this is a local affiliate of habitat for humanity international.

—
10
Lakeshore Humane Society Inc

The mission of the organization is to aid, advocate and adopt to enhance the lives of companion animals.

Animals
11
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
12
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lafayette Urban Ministry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loving Paws Animal Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $166,200 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $154,800 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYSEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $119,250 · OtherSEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INCTHE BRANCH WESLEYAN CHURCH: $80,200 · OtherTHE BRANCH WESLEYAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $76,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162: $59,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $54,800 · OtherTIPPECANOE COUNTY LIBRARY FDN: $44,500 · OtherNICHES LAND TRUST INC: $140,000 · OtherNICHES LAND TRUST INCLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $56,500 · Other+18 more: $300,550 · Other+18 moreYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $144,000 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH I…LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC: $140,300 · Human ServicesLAFAYETTE URBAN MINI…BAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $112,000 · Human ServicesBAUER FAMILY RESOURC…THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $110,967 · Human ServicesTHOMAS DUNCAN HALL I…WABASH CENTER INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesWABASH CENTER INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $30,750 · Human Services+2 more: $29,300 · Human ServicesLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $361,000 · PhilanthropyLAFAYETTE PAR…TRINITY HORIZONS INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyTRINITY HORIZ…PAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER: $290,000 · AnimalsPAWS N CLAWS…Almost Home Humane Society Inc: $64,700 · AnimalsAlmost Home …+2 more: $14,000 · AnimalsFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $249,000 · Food & NutritionIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $208,000 · EducationHarrison Highschool Robotics Boosters Inc: $25,000 · EducationASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENG & TECH INC: $113,000 · Youth DevelopmentLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $15,300 · Youth Development
Other$1,252,450Human Services$607,317Philanthropy$392,000Animals$368,700Food & Nutrition$249,000Education$233,000Youth Development$208,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $361,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetPAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER: $290,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $249,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $208,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $144,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC: $140,300 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetNICHES LAND TRUST INC: $140,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENG & TECH INC: $113,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetBAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $112,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC: $110,967 over 6y, 12% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $80,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAlmost Home Humane Society Inc: $64,700 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162: $59,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $56,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWABASH CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHENDERSON SETTLEMENT INC: $38,200 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY HORIZONS INC: $31,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $30,750 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC: $23,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetServants at Work Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWOODHAVEN RESCUE FARM INC: $17,800 over 1y, 17% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $15,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLAFAYETTE TREE FUND INC: $9,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $9,300 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetLOVING PAWS ANIMAL CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NICHES LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENG & TECH INC ↗
  • Who funds BAUER FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAGAMORE COUNCIL 162 ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WABASH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSON SETTLEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE ↗
  • Who funds Harrison Highschool Robotics Boosters Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODHAVEN RESCUE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE TREE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lafayette Community FoundationIN43× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Sia Foundation Inc · The McAllister Foundation · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · The Scheumann Foundation Inc · North Central Health Services Inc · Coffin Family Foundation Inc · Arconic Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister’s filings →

    More from the funding graph