· Private foundation
Alfred I Dupont Trust Ua
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| GRACE MEDICAL HOME INC | $25,000 |
| FIRST STATE SQUASH INC | $15,000 |
| DETROIT HORSE POWER | $10,000 |
| ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CAMP HOLE IN THE WALL | $10,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC | $10,000 |
| LIGHTSHARE | $10,000 |
| CAMP BOGGY CREEK | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE NURSING SCHOLARS FUND | $10,000 |
| WORLD AFFRAIRS COUNCIL OF JACKSONVILLE | $10,000 |
| SUPPORT OUR SCHOLARS | $5,000 |
| MATCHING GIFT - FAMILY HOUSING MANAGEMENT CO INC | $1,000 |
| MATCHING GIFT - VISION IS PRICELESS COUNCIL | $1,000 |
| HUGS ACROSS THE COUNTY INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGrace Medical Home Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $78k · revenue +1%
- TBTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC7× · 2019–2025 · $71k · revenue +16%
- TATHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +154%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $28k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE NURSING SCHOLARSHIPone grant, 2023 · $28k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
See schedule o for a complete description of the organization's mission
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.
Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
Disability rights florida advocates, educates, investigates, and litigates to protect and advance the rights, dignity, equal opportunities, self-determination and choices for all people with disabilities.
To provide a safe blood supply that meets or exceeds the needs of each community we serve, and to provide a variety of services in support of ongoing and emerging blood and transfusion-related activities.
Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Boys' Latin School of Maryland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Grace Medical Home Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REACH RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds First State Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS DELAWARE & MARYLAND'S EASTERN SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds EDYTH BUSH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of Jacksonville Inc ↗
- Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds VISION IS PRICELESS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TATUM PARKER PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Nor' Easter Foundation Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Galloway Foundation · Edyth Bush Charitable Foundation Inc · James T and Diana P Barnes Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alfred I Dupont Trust Ua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Riverside Development Corp — 100% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Humane Animal Partners — 14% of income from government
- First State Squash Inc — 7% of income from government
- Jacksonville University — 3% of income from government
- Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery Inc — 0% of income from government
- Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alfred I Dupont Trust Ua?
Find your warmest path to Alfred I Dupont Trust Ua through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.