Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alex C Young Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$430k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Arts & Culture$766kEducation$449kFood & Nutrition$330kReligion$330kEnvironment$317kAnimals$185k
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $272k
$33,451
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI$81,135
CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL$71,675
FREESTORE FOODBANK INC$59,722
CITY GOSPEL MISSION$59,722
HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY$33,451
CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$33,451
SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION$33,451
CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC$28,679
NATURE CONSERVANCY INC$28,679
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC: $30k → 9%HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $35k → 16%NATURE CONSERVANCY INC: $30k → 7%CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC: $30k → 9%HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $35k → 16%NATURE CONSERVANCY INC: $30k → 7%CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC: $29k → 9%NATURE CONSERVANCY INC: $29k → 7%CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC: $28k → 9%SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%NATURE CONSERVANCY INC: $28k → 7%CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOC: $26k → 9%SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $33k → 16%SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $33k → 16%SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $31k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $62k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $62k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $60k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $58k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $55k → 16%CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $33k → 16%HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $33k → 16%HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $33k → 16%HAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $31k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $60k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $58k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $55k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $85k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $84k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $81k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $80k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $75k → 16%WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $45k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $75k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $74k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $72k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $70k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $66k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $62k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $62k → 16%CINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $40k → 16%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $35k → 16%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $35k → 16%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $33k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $33k → 16%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $33k → 16%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $31k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$2.2M
$0

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Food & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $330k · revenue +3%
  • ST
    SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2021–2026 · $185k · revenue +45%
  • CS
    CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    6× · 2021–2026 · $185k · revenue +161%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    WALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI: $449,273 · OtherWALNUT HILLS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNICINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVAL: $396,547 · OtherCINCINNATI MUSICAL FESTIVALCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $330,319 · OtherCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATESHAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETY: $185,070 · OtherHAMILTON COUNTY SOCIETYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $158,668 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $330,319 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODB…SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $185,070 · AnimalsCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $184,876 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER: $158,668 · Environment
    Other$1,519,877Food & Nutrition$330,319Animals$185,070Arts & Culture$184,876Environment$158,668

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $330,319 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $330,319 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION: $185,070 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $184,876 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $158,668 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER: $158,668 over 6y, 0.9% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
    • Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES ↗
    • Who funds SAVE THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
    • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Duke Energy FoundationNC13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Alex C Young Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alex C Young Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Alex C Young’s filings →

      More from the funding graph