· Public charity
Albuquerque Convention & Visitors Bureau
As the official destination marketing organization for the city, visit albuquerque is responsible for promoting albuquerque as a competitive and world-class leisure, meeting, convention and sports destination, and enhancing its public image as a dynamic place to live and work.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of ALBUQUERQUE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $495,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $518,349 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,349 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLUE RIVER PRODUCTIONS | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE & HISTORY | $30,000 |
| INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER INC | $30,000 |
| EXPLORA | $30,000 |
| HISTORIC OLD TOWN ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| FLAMENCO WORKS INC | $25,000 |
| PASSPORT TO PUEBLO COUNTRY | $25,000 |
| AMP CONCERTS | $25,000 |
| MELTDOWN STUDIO LLC | $25,000 |
| LUNA AND LUZ LLC | $20,000 |
| ARTS HUB | $15,000 |
| ARTEMIS PROMOTIONS INC | $15,000 |
| CASA FLAMENCA | $15,000 |
| PLEASED TO PRESENT INC | $15,000 |
| M'TUCCI'S BAR ROMA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Albuquerque Convention & Visitors Bureau’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NINATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO3× · 2023–2025 · $68k · revenue +47%
- ADADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +12%
- MSMariachi Spectacular de Albuquerque3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- EPELECTRIC PLAYHOUSEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- BJBIG JIM FARMSone grant, 2023 · $50k
- FFUSIONone grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission is to promote, present and preserve hispanic arts & culture of nm. showcasing, encourging & supporting participation of hispanics in local arts economy; and presenting creative & cultural richness of our heritage, including arts &…
EmiArteFlamenco Academy is produced and directed by Vicente Griego and La Emi. Launched in 2014, this dynamic company is comprised of an ensemble of local and international artists, dancers and musicians. It embraces artistic excellence…
Enhance the cultural arts community through dance performance company and dance academy.
To promote folk music and dance.
Support and Enhance Performing
The new mexico performing arts society is organized exclusively for charitable, artistic, and educational purposes; more specifically to promote and perform high quality classical music and other performance art forms by new mexico artists…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albuquerque Little Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Cardboard Playhouse Theatre Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO ↗
- Who funds AMP Concerts ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FLAMENCO WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC OLD TOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Orphan Signs ↗
- Who funds Mariachi Spectacular de Albuquerque ↗
- Who funds FUSION ↗
- Who funds Casa Flamenca Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO WINE & GRAPE GROWERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ATOMIC MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Downtown ABQ Mainstreet Initiative ↗
- Who funds CARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GUJRATI SAMAJ OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO TRADE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CARDBOARD PLAYHOUSE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ARTS HUB ↗
- Who funds WHEELES MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUKE CITY REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds NOB HILL MAINSTREET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Vintage Albuquerque Fine Wine & Art Auction · New Mexico Humanities Council · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Albuquerque Convention & Visitors Bureau funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.