Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert W Cherne Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$650k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.6MReligion$311kScience & Tech$300kHealth$248kArts & Culture$200kCivil Rights$60kRecreation & Sports$50kHuman Services$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $560k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN$200,000
INTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC$150,000
RISEN CHRIST SCHOOL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
MINNESOTA HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$15,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK$10,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE$10,000
THE KIRSCH FOUNDATION$10,000
MANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$10,000
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE$5,000
HATS AND MITTENS ASSOCIATION$5,000
HISTORIC IRONWOOD THEATER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
WI
MI
NJ
CA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 20 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$2.6M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-9%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $275k · revenue +5%
  • The President and Trustees of Colby College
    4× · 2017–2020 · $250k · revenue +37%
  • PS
    PHOENIX SEMINARY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -10%
  • CJ
    CAMP JORN YOUNG MENS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TS
    TUCK SCHOOL AT DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hats & Mittens Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RISEN CHRIST SCHOOL: $865,000 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLHOWARD YOUNG MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherHOWARD YOUNG MEDICAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRACE CHURCH: $77,000 · OtherGRACE CHURCH+15 more: $180,000 · Other+15 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $275,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAU…The President and Trustees of Colby College: $250,000 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby…PHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $220,000 · EducationPHOENIX SEMINARY INCHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $175,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE+1 more: $500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONA…HATS & MITTENS ASSOCIATION: $29,000 · PhilanthropyHATS & MITTE…NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $175,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 · Civil RightsThe Kirsch Foundation: $25,000 · HealthINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $20,000 · HealthMINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthCAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,352,000Education$920,500Philanthropy$329,000Arts & Culture$180,000Civil Rights$60,000Health$60,000Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $300,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $275,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $220,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $175,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHATS & MITTENS ASSOCIATION: $29,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetThe Kirsch Foundation: $25,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HATS & MITTENS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Kirsch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds MANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert W Cherne Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert W Cherne Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert W Cherne’s filings →

    More from the funding graph