Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert B Cuppage Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$61kHealth$40kRecreation & Sports$39kHuman Services$31kCommunity Improvement$28kFood & Nutrition$25kReligion$25kYouth Development$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBERT LEA CHAMBER FOUNDATION$5,000
ALBERT LEA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$4,875
ST THEODORE CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
AL PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,500
GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
RIVERLAND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 56$2,000
SEMCAC$2,000
ECUMENCIAL FOOD SHELF$2,000
ALBERT LEA FAMILY Y$2,000
ST THEODORE CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
FREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
LIFE CENTER OF FREEBORN COUNTY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEMCAC: $2k → 12%SEMCAC: $2k → 12%SEMCAC: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 28 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$241k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+79%

Still filing today

29%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ALBERT LEA FREEBORN COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +6%
  • FC
    FREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%
  • SO
    ST OLAF COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FC
    FREEBORN COUNTY TRAIL ASSOC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • AL
    ALBERT LEA DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
2
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
7
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
8
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
9
Anderson University

The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

Education
10
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
11
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
12
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia College Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Albert Lea Healthcare Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THEODORE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $23,000 · OtherST THEODORE CATHOLIC CHURCHRIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17,000 · OtherRIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEYOUTH FOR CHRIST: $16,500 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRISTALBERT LEA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherALBERT LEA CHAMBER FOUNDATIONALBERT LEA FAMILY Y: $14,000 · OtherALBERT LEA FAMILY YECUNEMICAL FOOD SHELF: $10,000 · OtherFREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,600 · OtherAZ-1: $8,000 · OtherECUMENCIAL FOOD SHELF: $8,000 · Other+36 more: $95,250 · Other+36 moreALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION: $38,000 · HealthALBERT LEA HEA…ALBERT LEA FREEBORN COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Community ImprovementST OLAF COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $3,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 · EducationALBERT LEA AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATI: $4,875 · Recreation & SportsRIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsSEMCAC: $6,000 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$215,350Health$38,000Community Improvement$20,000Education$9,000Recreation & Sports$6,875Human Services$6,000Youth Development$1,500Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION: $38,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetALBERT LEA FREEBORN COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetFREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,600 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSEMCAC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT LEA AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATI: $4,875 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT LEA FREEBORN COUNTY CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SEMCAC ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT LEA AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATI ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert B Cuppage Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert B Cuppage Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Albert B Cuppage Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Albert B Cuppage Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert B Cuppage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph