Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Minnesota · Nonprofit

ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION

ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION (Minnesota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,290 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($100,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$161k
Revenue FY2025
6
Funders on record
$232k
Grants received
$3.1M
Net assets
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 40%

Against its field

ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION's revenue fell 64% between 2019 and 2025.

Months of reserve1.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−16% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($446k) Expenses 100 ($4k) Net assets 100 ($442k)2020 Revenue 548 ($2.4M) Expenses 5107 ($191k) Net assets 609 ($2.7M)2021 Revenue 346 ($1.5M) Expenses 7704 ($289k) Net assets 893 ($3.9M)2022 Revenue 77 ($345k) Expenses 9302 ($349k) Net assets 893 ($3.9M)2023 Revenue 19 ($85k) Expenses 10002 ($375k) Net assets 827 ($3.7M)2024 Revenue 20 ($88k) Expenses 10770 ($404k) Net assets 756 ($3.3M)2025 Revenue 36 ($161k) Expenses 11212 ($420k) Net assets 692 ($3.1M)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (36)Expenses (11212)Net assets (692)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

44% of ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$442k
19
$2.3M
20
$1.3M
21
$3k
22
$290k
23
$316k
24
25
1.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $10k → $7k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION.

43%
largest funder
83%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 45% · 2021 100% · 2022 72% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

71% of ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $68k that is directly attributable, 56% of it comes from Minnesota funders.

MN
WI
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $164k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION?
ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION (Minnesota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,290 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($100,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $232,290 in grants to ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALBERT LEA HEALTHCARE COALITION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing