Skip to content

· Public charity

Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

The fund is operated to support the charitable efforts of the oklahoma city community foundation.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$185kHealth$130kEducation$110kHousing & Shelter$108kYouth Development$105kHuman Services$65kPhilanthropy$20kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $112,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $132,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$10,000
HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC$10,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
EL SISTEMA OKLAHOMA$10,000
REMERGE INC$10,000
VARIETY CARE$10,000
YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY$10,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$10,000
OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE$10,000
THE CARE CENTER$7,500
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,500
SISU YOUTH SERVICES$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE CARE CENTER: $8k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$678k · 13 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$678k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+141%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    Variety Care Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +114%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +23%
  • OA
    OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CK
    CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +141%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
4
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
9
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
10
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
11
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
12
Oklahoma Repertory Theatre Group Inc

Okc rep produces live theater that builds community, creates conversation, and inspires us all.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Epstein Parton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHO…Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma…CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INCOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INCOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS C…EL SISTEMA OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureEL SISTEMA OKLAHOMA INCBALLET OKLAHOMA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET OKLAHOMA INCVariety Care Inc: $100,000 · HealthVariety Care IncCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $20,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL…KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GAM…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $40,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $7,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterREMERGE INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE EPSTEIN PARTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other
Youth Development$185,000Arts & Culture$185,000Health$120,000Education$100,000Human Services$55,000Housing & Shelter$47,500Crime & Legal$20,000Other$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVariety Care Inc: $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $70,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEL SISTEMA OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBALLET OKLAHOMA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREMERGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPSTEIN PARTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Arnall Family Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Variety Care Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • El Sistema Oklahoma Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc?

Find your warmest path to Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Albers Family Affiliated Fund of Occf’s filings →

More from the funding graph