Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2017
34
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$80k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $158k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’17
4
’18
0
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$4.4MHousing & Shelter$350kHuman Services$83kEducation$77kArts & Culture$23kHealth$7kInternational$5kSocial Science$5kOther$0
02FY2017 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k32 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Emergency Fund$80,000
Teach for America - DC Region$25,000
Supreme Court Historical Society$6,000
The Aspen Institute$5,000
Business Executives for National Se$5,000
US Holocaust Museum$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Ravinia Festival$3,823
Individual grant recipient$3,225
National Museum of Women in Arts$3,000
JFCS of the Suncoast$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,320
The Alliance Francaise$2,000
Digestive Health Foundation$1,500
City of Hope$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%North Shore Senior Center: $100 → 14%JFCS of the Suncoast: $3k → 9%The Chicago Lighthouse: $850 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
CA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberglessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
6
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,063,518 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $2,037,949 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOSchwab Charitable: $327,336 · OtherSchwab Cha…Emergency Fund: $80,000 · OtherEmergency …+27 more: $33,455 · Other+27 moreALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $350,000 · Housing & ShelterCornell University: $50,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $25,000 · Education+2 more: $3,500 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $3,823 · Arts & CultureTHE ALLIANCE FRANCAISEFRENCH HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCEDILLE CHICAGO NFP: $1,200 · Arts & CultureBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $5,000 · InternationalTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · Social Science
Philanthropy$4,101,467Other$440,791Housing & Shelter$350,000Education$78,500Arts & Culture$12,023International$5,000Social Science$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,063,518 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $2,037,949 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $350,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCornell University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $3,823 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrewster Academy: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FRANCAISEFRENCH HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEDILLE CHICAGO NFP: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LONGBOAT KEY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $135 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Cat Depot: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg?

Find your warmest path to Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alan Stone Family Charitable Foundation % Reed Smith LLP - Harry Rosenberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph