· Public charity
Alamo Kiwanis Club Charities Inc
The Alamo Kiwanis Club Charities exists for the sole purpose of raising funds for children in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $104,975 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $140,975 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $36,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k15 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL | $10,000 |
| RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO | $8,475 |
| WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS | $7,500 |
| CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS | $7,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO | $7,000 |
| TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC | $5,000 |
| AUTISM TREATMENT CENTER | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS INC | $5,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL INC | $5,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF SAN ANTONIO | $5,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO | $5,000 |
| ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC | $5,000 |
| ALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION INC | $5,000 |
| RANSOMED LIFE INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (4× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +14%
- W4Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc3× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +411%
- RCRespite Care of San Antonio Inc2× · 2019–2020 · $13k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- DDDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +140%
- BIBELIEVE IT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +128%
- UTUpward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanshipone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide dynamic enrichment programs for children with special needs and respite for their families.
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
Child Advocacy
Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.
To improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and those who care for them.
Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Upward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds RANSOMED LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds DISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Upward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanship ↗
- Who funds AID THE SILENT ↗
- Who funds ALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alamo Kiwanis Club Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alamo Kiwanis Club Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alamo Kiwanis Club Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.