Skip to content

· Public charity

Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc

Educate the public on all issues relevant to abortion.

$223k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$931kHuman Services$181kReligion$22kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $218,137, the rows itemized in this filing. The $222,812 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,675 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $147k
$6,709
Median grant
1
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTHERS$146,578
WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC$14,712
LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES-SHELBY$12,693
2B CHOICES FOR WOMEN$6,709
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$6,709
CHOOSE LIFE OF NORTH ALABAMA$6,625
LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES-HSV$6,625
AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC$6,625
SHOALS SAVALIFE$5,605
SAV-A-LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER$5,256
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $14k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $10k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $7k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $6k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $6k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $6k → 11%AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+112%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +159%
  • WH
    WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $79k · revenue +105%
  • SC
    SAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $66k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • AN
    ANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +112%
  • AO
    AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Agape Women's Services

Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…

Health
2
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
3
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
4
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
5
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
6
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
7
Answers for Life

Provide FREE pregnancy care, test and counseling for needy women through delivery of the baby.

Human Services
8
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
9
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
10
Hope for Life Pregnancy Care Center

The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies

Health
11
Life Saver Ministries Inc

Pregnancy resource counseling

Human Services
12
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shoals Sav-a-Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHERS: $571,666 · OtherOTHERSPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $90,094 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERSAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY: $65,675 · OtherSAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTYChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc: $47,493 · OtherChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc+2 more: $23,949 · OtherWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $78,812 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S HOPE …SAV-A-LIFE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC: $26,240 · Civil RightsSAV-A-LIFE TE…Womens Resource Center Inc: $25,998 · Civil RightsWomens Resour…ANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5,380 · Civil RightsLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $99,906 · ReligionLIFELINE CHI…SHOALS SAV-A-LIFE INC: $22,448 · ReligionSHOALS SAV-A…AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $55,228 · Human ServicesAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $5,260 · Human ServicesEtowah Pregnancy Testing Center: $21,537 · Health
Other$798,877Civil Rights$136,430Religion$122,354Human Services$60,488Health$21,537

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $99,906 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $78,812 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetSAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY: $65,675 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetAGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $55,228 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc: $47,493 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSAV-A-LIFE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC: $26,240 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWomens Resource Center Inc: $25,998 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSHOALS SAV-A-LIFE INC: $22,448 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEtowah Pregnancy Testing Center: $21,537 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetWIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC: $10,119 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5,380 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $5,260 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Choose Life Of North Alabama Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAV-A-LIFE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHOALS SAV-A-LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Etowah Pregnancy Testing Center ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph