· Public charity
Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc
Educate the public on all issues relevant to abortion.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of ALABAMA PRO-LIFE COALITION EDUCATION FUND INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $218,137 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $222,812 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,675 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $147k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OTHERS | $146,578 |
| WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC | $14,712 |
| LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES-SHELBY | $12,693 |
| 2B CHOICES FOR WOMEN | $6,709 |
| WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER | $6,709 |
| CHOOSE LIFE OF NORTH ALABAMA | $6,625 |
| LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES-HSV | $6,625 |
| AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC | $6,625 |
| SHOALS SAVALIFE | $5,605 |
| SAV-A-LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER | $5,256 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC6× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +159%
- WHWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC6× · 2019–2024 · $79k · revenue +105%
- SCSAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY6× · 2017–2023 · $66k · revenue +139%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA INCone grant, 2022 · $14k
- ANANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +112%
- AOAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INCone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…
Choosing Life over Abortion
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.
To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.
Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…
Provide FREE pregnancy care, test and counseling for needy women through delivery of the baby.
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.
The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies
Pregnancy resource counseling
An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shoals Sav-a-Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SAV-A-LIFE CALHOUN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AGAPE OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Choose Life Of North Alabama Inc ↗
- Who funds SAV-A-LIFE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SHOALS SAV-A-LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Etowah Pregnancy Testing Center ↗
- Who funds WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds ANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.