How much does Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc give?

Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc reported 35 grants totaling $2,754,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 34 and 36 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (86%), Human Services (5%), Civil Rights (3%).

Who are Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Tri County Childrens Advocacy Cent ($772k), Cramer Childrens Center Inc ($694k), Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center ($692k).

Does Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Alabama Power Foundation Inc, The Daniel Foundation of Alabama, National Children's Alliance Inc.

Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc

Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc

Q: Where is Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc based?

Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc is based in AL.

The alabama network of children's advocacy centers promotes the multidisciplinary process in fostering an abuse-free society for alabama's childrena nd supports the development of the children's advocacy center model through public awareness, training and collaborative partnerships.

$2.8M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$110k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$15MHuman Services$949kCivil Rights$604kPhilanthropy$544kHealth$304kYouth Development$44kOther$0

02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k3 grants · $84k
$50k–250k32 grants · $2.7M

$80,000

Median grant

States reached

$493k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TRI COUNTY CAC	$110,000
BUTTERFLY BRIDGE CAC	$90,000
MORGAN COUNTY CAC	$90,000
CARE HOUSE - BALDWIN CO	$90,000
RUSSELL COUNTY CAC	$90,000
CRAMER CHILDREN'S CENTER	$90,000
BROOKS' PLACE CAC - CULLMAN	$90,000
SHELBY COUNTY CAC	$90,000
NATIONAL CAC	$90,000
BUTLER COUNTY CAC	$80,000
PALMER PLACE	$80,000
LIMESTONE ATHENS CAC	$80,000
WALKER COUNTY CAC	$80,000
CENTRAL AL REGIONAL CAC	$80,000
ST CLAIR COUNTY CAC	$80,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$21M · 37 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$21M

$9k

Still filing today

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
TRI COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENT
9× · 2017–2025 · $772k · revenue +54% · 43% of their budget
CC
CRAMER CHILDRENS CENTER INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $694k · revenue +72% · 30% of their budget
SC
Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center
9× · 2017–2025 · $692k · revenue +82% · 58% of their budget

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2018 · $9k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services

Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal

Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal

Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal

Child and Youth Advocacy Center

To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…

Human Services

Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal

Carroll County Child Advocacy Center Inc

The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County

—

Robertson County Child Advocacy Cen

Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.

Crime & Legal

Lasalle County Childrens Advocacy Center

Advocacy and care of physically and sexually abused children in lasalle county. we work with the court system in determining the best placement for children.

Crime & Legal

Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health

Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc; the most unlike its peers is Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/34

Grantees still filing

29/34

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Crime & Legal$7,407,765Other$5,838,727Human Services$5,300,413Civil Rights$693,976Philanthropy$624,285Youth Development$425,114Health$373,629

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL29.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · National Children's Alliance Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Community Partnership of Alabama Inc · United Way of Central Alabama Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home