· Public charity
Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc
The alabama network of children's advocacy centers promotes the multidisciplinary process in fostering an abuse-free society for alabama's childrena nd supports the development of the children's advocacy center model through public awareness, training and collaborative partnerships.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
- $50k–250k35 grants · $6.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRI COUNTY CAC | $213,630 |
| BUTTERFLY BRIDGE CAC | $210,248 |
| SHELBY COUNTY CAC | $208,361 |
| CARE HOUSE - BALDWIN CO | $207,361 |
| CRAMER CHILDREN'S CENTER | $207,361 |
| NATIONAL CAC | $197,361 |
| PRESCOTT HOUSE | $190,361 |
| TUSCALOOSA CHILDREN'S CENTER | $190,361 |
| TWIN CEDARS CAC | $190,361 |
| SOUTHEAST ALABAMA CAC | $190,361 |
| CHILDREN PROTECT - MONTGOMERY | $190,361 |
| CAC OF MOBILE | $190,361 |
| MORGAN COUNTY CAC | $184,923 |
| WEST AL CAC | $183,294 |
| CENTRAL AL REGIONAL CAC | $182,114 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTRI COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENT8× · 2017–2024 · $662k · revenue +110% · 43% of their budget
- CCCRAMER CHILDRENS CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $604k · revenue +64% · 30% of their budget
- SCShelby County Children's Advocacy Center8× · 2017–2024 · $602k · revenue +101% · 58% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.
Child Advocacy Services
Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…
Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.
Advocacy and care of physically and sexually abused children in lasalle county. we work with the court system in determining the best placement for children.
The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.
To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.
Coordinating agency for abused children
The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeast Alabama Child Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRI COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENT ↗
- Who funds CRAMER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds CARE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MORGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF CULLMAN INC ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CTR ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TUSCALOOSA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST CLAIR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Prescott House ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ALABAMA CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Child Protect Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WEST ALABAMA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DEKALB COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CALHOUN-CLEBURNE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PIKE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BUTTERFLY BRIDGE CHILD ADVOCACY CEN ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds James M Barrie Center for Children ↗
- Who funds TALLADEGA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds WALKER COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BESSEMER CUT-OFF ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Covington County Child Advocacy Inc ↗
- Who funds ATHENS LIMESTONE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADDIES PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF WINSTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BLACKBELT REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · National Children's Alliance Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Community Partnership of Alabama Inc · United Way of Central Alabama Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.