Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Private foundation

Akt Foundation

$10k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
11
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$1,633
States reached, FY2023
2
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Human Services$4kInternational$2kHealth$1kCommunity Improvement$1kPhilanthropy$1kReligion$1kEducation$500Science & Tech$500Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kibo Group International Incorporated$1,63310%
Refugee Language Project$1,00010%
The Hope and Healing Place Inc$1,00010%
Mns Foundation Inc$1,00011%
Eveline's Sunshine Cottage$1,00010%
Southwest Church of Christ$1,0001n/a
Mission 2540$1,00010%
High Plains Children's Home and Family Services Inc$50010%
Storybridge Inc$50010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($2k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Akt Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKibo Group International Incorporated: $1,633 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRefugee Language Project: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Hope and Healing Place Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMns Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEveline's Sunshine Cottage: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMission 2540: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHigh Plains Children's Home and Family Services Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStorybridge Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…High Plains Christian…Mary E Bivins Foundat…Xcel Energy FoundationCj and Syble Fowlston…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Josephine Anderson Ch…Amazonsmile Foundation
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Akt Foundation with peer funders

About Akt Foundation

How much does Akt Foundation give?
Akt Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $10,133 in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Akt Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (34%), International (16%), Health (10%).
Who are Akt Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Kibo Group International Incorporated ($2k), Refugee Language Project ($1k), The Hope and Healing Place Inc ($1k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Akt Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amarillo Area Foundation Inc, High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation, Mary E Bivins Foundation.
Where is Akt Foundation based?
Akt Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Akt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home