Skip to content

· Private foundation

Akerson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$674kFood & Nutrition$539kHousing & Shelter$523kReligion$513kPhilanthropy$344kHuman Services$231kRecreation & Sports$185kCrime & Legal$181kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART STROKE ASSOC$40,000
HOPE WORKS$40,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$38,000
JOY JUNCTION$36,000
HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS$36,000
CAMP ENCHANTMENT$36,000
ST FELIX PANTRY$33,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
THE STOREHOUSE$28,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
BIBLE PROJECT$25,000
BARRETT FOUNDATION$23,000
OUTCOMES INC$23,000
CENTRO SAVILA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $17k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NM: $15k → 23%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $14k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $14k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $13k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $10k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $6k → 19%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $5k → 19%SAFE HOUSE: $12k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $10k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $9k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $9k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $6k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $6k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 35 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
8

Total granted

$3.5M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+142%

Still filing today

37%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FELIX PANTRY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $209k · revenue +28%
  • MO
    Meals on Wheels New Mexico
    7× · 2019–2025 · $199k · revenue +215%
  • OI
    OUTCOMES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $141k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - WALK
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • HC
    HOPE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
2
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
3
New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness

To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Casa Milagro

To provide permanent housing and stabilizing support services to people exiting homelessness and managing mental health challenges.

Human Services
5
Esperanza Shelter Inc

To conduct a program of social services, advocacy and education, designed to alleviate the problem of domestic violence in north central new mexico with the stated goals of protecting people from abuse, neglect and exploitation, and to…

—
6
New Mexico Aids Services Inc

New mexico aids services, inc provides housing, education and nutritional support to the public in response to the aids crisis.

Human Services
7
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—
8
Neighborhood House of Calexico

to engage in social action through self-determination for all individuals by providing educational, financial, housing, and other support services.

Community Improvement
9
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
10
Heading Home

Heading home's mission is: "to empower individuals experiencing homelessness through compassionate outreach, comprehensive support services, and community partnerships, creating pathways to stable housing and the opportunity to thrive." to…

Housing & Shelter
11
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
12
Enlace Comunitario

To work to eliminate domestic violence in the latino immigrant community and to promote healthy families through comprehensive domestic violence intervention services in spanish, preventative community education policy advocacy and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Las Cruces Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPEWORKS: $236,000 · OtherHOPEWORKSCATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $214,922 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATIONST FELIX PANTRY INC: $209,000 · OtherST FELIX PANTRY INCJOY JUNCTION INC: $186,000 · OtherJOY JUNCTION INCCAMP ENCHANTMENT: $185,000 · OtherCAMP ENCHANTMENTAMERICAN HEART STROKE ASSOC: $183,000 · OtherAMERICAN HEART STROKE ASSOCHEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $168,000 · OtherHEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESSIndividual grant recipient: $151,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTCOMES INC: $141,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $134,000 · OtherUNITED WAY: $99,533 · Other+23 more: $839,684 · Other+23 moreMeals on Wheels New Mexico: $199,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on …STOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO: $131,000 · Food & NutritionSTOREHOUS…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $121,000 · HealthTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $104,000 · HealthEL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC: $79,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSEINC: $57,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesRIO GRANDE DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesBARRETT FOUNDATION: $109,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBIBLEPROJECT: $94,000 · ReligionCROSSROADS FOR WOMEN: $90,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,747,139Food & Nutrition$330,000Health$225,000Human Services$161,000Housing & Shelter$119,000Religion$94,000Crime & Legal$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPEWORKS: $236,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetST FELIX PANTRY INC: $209,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico: $199,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetOUTCOMES INC: $141,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSTOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO: $131,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $121,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBARRETT FOUNDATION: $109,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $104,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $94,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS FOR WOMEN: $90,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetEL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC: $79,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetPB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE HOUSEINC: $57,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOpera Southwest: $40,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetRIO GRANDE DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetROBYNES NEST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds ST FELIX PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels New Mexico ↗
  • Who funds OUTCOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds STOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRETT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC ↗
  • Who funds PB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSEINC ↗
  • Who funds Opera Southwest ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pnm Tnmp FoundationNM30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Corio Foundation · The Jennifer Riordan Foundation · Hancock Family Foundation Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Red Rock Foundation Trust · The Foundation for Sustainable Living · Club Culturale Italiano Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Akerson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Akerson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Akerson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph