Skip to content

· Private foundation

Akawee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$35kEnvironment$22kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHousing & Shelter$6kInternational$2kArts & Culture$2kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER$5,000
COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS$2,500
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$2,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$1,000
MOLOKAI LAND TRUST$1,000
HUI HO OLANA$1,000
SONOMA LAND TRUST$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND$500
KQED$62
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 8%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 8%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 9 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$77k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

78%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • ML
    MOLOKAI LAND TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +221%
  • SL
    SONOMA LAND TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • WI
    WW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • PB
    PETALUMA BOUNTY PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
Napa County Land Trust

The mission of the land trust of napa county is to preserve the character of napa county by permanently protecting land. the organization's vision is the protection of unique natural resources, proactive preservation of the scenic beauty,…

Environment
3
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
6
Kendal At Sonoma a Zen Inspired Community

An authentic, sustainable, awake, engaged community, evolving the practice of senior living in a calm, compassionate, respectful environment, informed by the teachings of wisdom and contemplative care.

Housing & Shelter
7
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
8
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
9
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sonoma Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is The Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTMAS CHEER FOOD TOY PROGRAM: $30,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS CHEER FOOD TOY PROGRAMCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $5,650 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESSWW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherWW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,515 · Other+6 more: $4,800 · Other+6 moreMOLOKAI LAND TRUST: $8,500 · EnvironmentMOLOKAI LAND TRUSTSONOMA LAND TRUST: $8,140 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUSTPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $12,500 · Human ServicesPETALUMA PEOPLE…HUI HOOLANA: $4,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $62 · Arts & CultureREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $4,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · InternationalUNA VIDA: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $1,000 · Membership BenefitPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION: $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$47,965Environment$16,640Human Services$12,500Arts & Culture$5,562Food & Nutrition$4,000International$3,000Membership Benefit$1,000Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOLOKAI LAND TRUST: $8,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST: $8,140 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $5,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUI HOOLANA: $4,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNA VIDA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $62 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MOLOKAI LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS ↗
  • Who funds HUI HOOLANA ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNA VIDA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds POLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Akawee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Akawee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Akawee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph