Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Akawee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$35kEnvironment$22kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHousing & Shelter$6kInternational$2kArts & Culture$2kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER$5,000
COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS$2,500
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$2,000
MOLOKAI LAND TRUST$1,000
HUI HO OLANA$1,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$1,000
SONOMA LAND TRUST$1,000
ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$500
KQED$62
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 8%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 8%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 9 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$77k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

78%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • ML
    MOLOKAI LAND TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +221%
  • SL
    SONOMA LAND TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • WI
    WW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • PB
    PETALUMA BOUNTY PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

2
Napa County Land Trust

The mission of the land trust of napa county is to preserve the character of napa county by permanently protecting land. the organization's vision is the protection of unique natural resources, proactive preservation of the scenic beauty,…

Environment
3
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
6
Kendal At Sonoma a Zen Inspired Community

An authentic, sustainable, awake, engaged community, evolving the practice of senior living in a calm, compassionate, respectful environment, informed by the teachings of wisdom and contemplative care.

Housing & Shelter
7
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
8
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

9
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sonoma Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is The Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRISTMAS CHEER FOOD TOY PROGRAM — $30,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS CHEER FOOD TOY PROGRAMCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $5,650 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESSWW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherWW II AIRBORNE DEMO TEAM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $2,515 · Other+6 more — $4,800 · Other+6 moreMOLOKAI LAND TRUST — $8,500 · EnvironmentMOLOKAI LAND TRUSTSONOMA LAND TRUST — $8,140 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUSTPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER — $12,500 · Human ServicesPETALUMA PEOPLE…HUI HOOLANA — $4,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $62 · Arts & CultureREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $4,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,000 · InternationalUNA VIDA — $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $1,000 · Membership BenefitPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION — $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$47,965Environment$16,640Human Services$12,500Arts & Culture$5,562Food & Nutrition$4,000International$3,000Membership Benefit$1,000Crime & Legal$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER — $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOLOKAI LAND TRUST — $8,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST — $8,140 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $5,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUI HOOLANA — $4,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNA VIDA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn — $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER
  • Who funds MOLOKAI LAND TRUST
  • Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
  • Who funds HUI HOOLANA
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds UNA VIDA
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC
  • Who funds The Sea Ranch Chapel Fdtn
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds POLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KQED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Akawee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph