Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aim 5 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$3.4MHuman Services$2.5MYouth Development$1.9MEducation$1.4MHealth$740kInternational$434kHousing & Shelter$420kArts & Culture$271kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $995k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS DISCOVERY CENTER$250,000
GO MINISTRIES$250,000
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF KS$250,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
KINSMEN INITIATIVE$157,500
EQUIP LEADERSHIP$100,000
ALLEYWAY RECOVERY CHURCH$100,000
LIFEHOUSE CAC$100,000
DOXAZO$100,000
ROLLLING HILLS CHRISTIAN CHURCH$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB TOPEKA$79,358
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$77,974
THE BRIDGE$70,000
WOOLY FARMS FOUNDATION$60,000
CHRISTIAN CHALLENGE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $500 → 17%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%DAD TIRED: $1k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $100k → 6%THE BRIDGE: $7k → 14%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $100k → 6%THE BRIDGE: $6k → 14%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $50k → 6%COMPASSION STRATEGIES: $25k → 14%COMPASSION STRATEGIES: $25k → 14%2030 FOUNDATION OF TOPEKA: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
IN
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 48 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
57

Total granted

$11M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

35%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +159%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +59%
  • GM
    GO MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $675k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MC
    MANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $340k · revenue -43%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +144%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $214k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
4
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
5
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
6
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
7
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
8
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
9
Kansas Family Foundation

Our goal is to come alongside the church in its gospel-first mission to transform lives and transform culture.

Religion
10
Tabor College

Preparing people for a life of learning, work, and service for Christ and His kingdom.

Education
11
Mid-America Christian University Inc

Mid-america christian university prepares students through a wesleyan perspective to create, collaborate, and innovate to solve local and global problems for the glory of god through jesus christ and the good of society.

—
12
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Topeka Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is You Can Begin Again Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
24/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION CHURCH TOPEKA: $2,212,184 · OtherMISSION CHURCH TOPEKAMISSION CHURCH OF TOPEKA INC: $310,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherCHILDRENS DISCOVERY CENTER: $250,000 · OtherADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF KS: $250,000 · Other+99 more: $3,502,846 · Other+99 moreLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,900,000 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SE…GO MINISTRIES INC: $675,000 · ReligionGO MINISTRIES INCKINSMEN INITIATIVE: $157,500 · ReligionKINSMEN INITIATIVEEQUIP Leadership Inc: $100,000 · Religion+2 more: $80,000 · ReligionYOUNG LIFE: $1,530,882 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA: $79,358 · Youth Development+2 more: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentMANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $340,000 · EducationMANHATTAN …TOPEKA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $296,000 · EducationTOPEKA COL…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $250,000 · EducationALLIANCE F…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $213,500 · EducationFOLDS OF H…WOOLLY FARMS FOUNDATION: $95,000 · EducationWOOLLY FAR…KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $77,974 · EducationKANSAS STA…+4 more: $30,500 · EducationJones Project Inc: $500,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Health+1 more: $3,000 · HealthChristian Alliance for Orphans: $250,000 · Human ServicesPure & Faultless: $61,432 · Human ServicesCOMPASSION STRATEGIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE: $22,150 · Human Services+3 more: $11,500 · Human ServicesLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $302,438 · International+1 more: $10,000 · International
Other$7,075,030Religion$2,912,500Youth Development$1,785,240Education$1,302,974Health$653,000Human Services$395,082International$312,438

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,900,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,530,882 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGO MINISTRIES INC: $675,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetJones Project Inc: $500,000 over 3y, 96% of budgetMANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $340,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $302,438 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTOPEKA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $296,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetChristian Alliance for Orphans: $250,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $213,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRASH MOUNTAIN PROJECT INC: $101,079 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOOLLY FARMS FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $77,974 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD A BETTER US: $75,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMPASSION STRATEGIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetDOXAZO MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA PARTNERSHIP INC: $44,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCREATE CAMPAIGN INC: $31,360 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $22,150 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProject 2 Restore Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CHARITABLE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE 2030 CLUB OF TOPEKA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTOP CITY PROMISE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetPROJECT TOPEKA FOOD DRIVE: $6,682 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPastorServe Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAD TIRED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GO MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Jones Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOPEKA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Alliance for Orphans ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KINSMEN INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRASH MOUNTAIN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN TOPEKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUIP Leadership Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds WOOLLY FARMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · Kansas Independent College Association · The Pete Henry Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Douglas County Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aim 5 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aim 5 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aim 5 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Aim 5 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aim 5’s filings →

    More from the funding graph