Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pete Henry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.7MPhilanthropy$370kHealth$82kCrime & Legal$50kArts & Culture$40kRecreation & Sports$34kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $129k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $236k
$4,950
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER NW KS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$101,173
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$71,300
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$63,350
COLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$34,950
BREWSTER USD 314$28,000
CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC$25,000
FORT HAYS NORTHWEST TECH$21,250
NORTH CENTRAL KS TECHNICAL COLLEGE$21,000
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY$10,200
MAIN STREET ARTS COUNCIL$10,000
WESTERN KANSAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-KEARNEY$9,000
KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$7,500
THOMAS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,500
FORT WALLACE MUSEUM$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DSNWK: $4k → 14%DSNWK: $4k → 14%DSNWK: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
OR
WY
SD
IN
OH
NJ
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
KS
AR
SC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 50 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
47

Total granted

$1.8M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+9%

Still filing today

28%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +54%
  • TC
    Tabor College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BS
    BREWSTER SCHOOL - USD 314
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • CR
    COLBY ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • GC
    GRAINFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
Midamerica Nazarene University

Midamerica nazarene university (mnu) is a transformative university that nurtures christlike community, pursues academic excellence, and cultivates a passion to serve. (continued on schedule o)mnu is a comprehensive liberal arts university…

Education
6
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
7
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
12
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University and the most unlike its peers is Grainfield Community Development Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 68 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%3%<5yr11%0%5–10yr16%8%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr15%11%35–55yr25%64%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr11%0%5–10yr16%3%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr15%38%35–55yr25%46%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
9%
1,530/17,480

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY — $353,350 · OtherFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITYKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY — $315,250 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYCOLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $231,750 · OtherCOLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGENORTHWEST KANSAS TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $104,700 · OtherNORTHWEST KANSAS TECHNICAL COLLEGENORTH CENTRAL KS TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $83,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS — $81,750 · OtherCOLBY SCHOOL - USD 315 — $67,500 · Other+76 more — $498,651 · Other+76 moreGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $362,173 · Community ImprovementGREATER NORTHWEST…+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementBenedictine College — $17,800 · EducationTabor College — $16,800 · EducationKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $14,900 · EducationCreighton University — $12,600 · EducationMANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC — $9,175 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGE — $7,000 · EducationBAKER UNIVERSITY — $6,800 · EducationSTERLING COLLEGE — $5,600 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $4,000 · Education+13 more — $23,500 · EducationCITIZENS FOUNDATION — $56,119 · PhilanthropyTHOMAS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyWestern Kansas Child Advocacy Center — $50,000 · Crime & LegalMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP — $4,000 · Arts & CultureDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC — $9,394 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND RURAL COUNSELING SERVICE — $4,000 · Health
Other$1,736,551Community Improvement$372,173Education$118,175Philanthropy$63,619Crime & Legal$50,000Arts & Culture$24,000Human Services$9,394Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $362,173 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCITIZENS FOUNDATION — $56,119 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetWestern Kansas Child Advocacy Center — $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetBenedictine College — $17,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTabor College — $16,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $14,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $12,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAINFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC — $9,394 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC — $9,175 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY — $6,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE — $5,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND RURAL COUNSELING SERVICE — $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL COLLEGE — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcKendree University — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOTTAWA UNIVERSITY — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Western Kansas Child Advocacy Center
  • Who funds MAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Benedictine College
  • Who funds Tabor College
  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GRAINFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC
  • Who funds MANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Independent College AssociationKS24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Independent College Association · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Greater Salina Community Foundation · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Jellison Benevolent Society Inc · Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · David and Mary P Rush Educational Trust Co Donald Hoffman Trustee · Earl Bane Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pete Henry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Seton Hall University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pete Henry Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Pete Henry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph