Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ahrens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Community Improvement$582kHuman Services$554kRecreation & Sports$501kReligion$276kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$25,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$272k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREG HOOD MINISTRIES$129,700
LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE$50,000
BAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$40,250
REGENERATION NASHVILLE$35,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$30,000
FUTURE CHURCH FRANKLIN$25,800
THE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC$20,000
TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$1,500
FRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%HOMEFULL: $5k → 14%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $5k → 9%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $5k → 9%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $100k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $50k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $50k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $30k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $10k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MA
OH
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 12 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.9M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionAnimalsEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • CF
    CENTERSTONE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +42%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • H
    HOMEFULLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +33%
  • NL
    NEW LENS BIBLICAL STUDIES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
3
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
4
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
5
Redeemed & Restored

Our mission is simple yet profound, changing lives through christ. we want to help individuals come to christ, being redeemed by his blood and restored and transformed by his word. our goal is to assist individuals struggling with…

Health
6
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
7
My Fathers House Nashville

The mission of My Fathers House Nashville (MFHN) is to provide shelter, parenting education, recovery information and life skills for fathers transitioning out of institutional settings or homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
One Family Memphis
Human Services
9
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
10
Palmetto Women's Center

The palmetto women's center in rock hill, sc is a non-profit agency serving the greater rock hill area since 1984. pwc offers pregnancy counseling, medical services, such as ultrasound and pregnancy testing, case management options to…

Health
11
LUKE10 Ministries Inc

The vision of luke10 ministries inc is to help all residents of sw georgia to understand, appreciate and embrace cultural diversity and demonstrate the love of jesus. luke1o ministries inc accomplishes this by a holistic approach to…

Religion
12
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homefull; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENERATION NASHVILLE: $578,600 · OtherREGENERATION NASHVILLEBAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $501,000 · OtherBAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTERFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $255,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYGREG HOOD MINISTRIES: $154,700 · OtherGREG HOOD MINISTRIESTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC: $90,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC+8 more: $74,300 · OtherLEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $250,000 · Human ServicesLEGACY MISSION …TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesCENTERSTONE FOUNDATION: $4,375 · HealthPregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc: $2,800 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $1,875 · HealthWILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 · ReligionPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION: $2,000 · AnimalsFRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $1,000 · Employment
Other$1,653,600Human Services$265,500Health$9,050Education$5,000Religion$2,500Animals$2,000Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $250,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOMEFULL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTERSTONE FOUNDATION: $4,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON NASHVILLE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc: $2,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahrens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahrens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ahrens Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph