Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ahrens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Community Improvement$582kHuman Services$554kRecreation & Sports$501kReligion$276kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$25,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$272k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREG HOOD MINISTRIES$129,700
LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE$50,000
BAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$40,250
REGENERATION NASHVILLE$35,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$30,000
FUTURE CHURCH FRANKLIN$25,800
THE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC$20,000
TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$1,500
FRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%HOMEFULL: $5k → 14%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $5k → 9%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $5k → 9%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $100k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $50k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $50k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $30k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $10k → 14%LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MA
OH
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 12 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$1.9M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionAnimalsEmploymentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • CF
    CENTERSTONE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +42%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • NL
    NEW LENS BIBLICAL STUDIES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
  • H
    HOMEFULLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
3
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
4
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
5
Redeemed & Restored

Our mission is simple yet profound, changing lives through christ. we want to help individuals come to christ, being redeemed by his blood and restored and transformed by his word. our goal is to assist individuals struggling with…

Health
6
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
7
My Fathers House Nashville

The mission of My Fathers House Nashville (MFHN) is to provide shelter, parenting education, recovery information and life skills for fathers transitioning out of institutional settings or homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
One Family Memphis
Human Services
9
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

10
Palmetto Women's Center

The palmetto women's center in rock hill, sc is a non-profit agency serving the greater rock hill area since 1984. pwc offers pregnancy counseling, medical services, such as ultrasound and pregnancy testing, case management options to…

Health
11
LUKE10 Ministries Inc

The vision of luke10 ministries inc is to help all residents of sw georgia to understand, appreciate and embrace cultural diversity and demonstrate the love of jesus. luke1o ministries inc accomplishes this by a holistic approach to…

Religion
12
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homefull and the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENERATION NASHVILLE — $578,600 · OtherREGENERATION NASHVILLEBAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $501,000 · OtherBAREFOOT REPUBLIC CAMP & RETREAT CENTERFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $255,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYGREG HOOD MINISTRIES — $154,700 · OtherGREG HOOD MINISTRIESTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC — $90,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC+8 more — $74,300 · OtherLEGACY MISSION VILLAGE — $250,000 · Human ServicesLEGACY MISSION …TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesCENTERSTONE FOUNDATION — $4,375 · HealthPregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc — $2,800 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $1,875 · HealthWILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,500 · ReligionPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION — $2,000 · AnimalsFRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC — $1,000 · Employment
Other$1,653,600Human Services$265,500Health$9,050Education$5,000Religion$2,500Animals$2,000Employment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEGACY MISSION VILLAGE — $250,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOMEFULL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERSTONE FOUNDATION — $4,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON NASHVILLE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc — $2,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY MISSION VILLAGE
  • Who funds TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOMEFULL
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds HANDS ON NASHVILLE INC
  • Who funds Pregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds PROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC
  • Who funds FRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds MURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ahrens Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph