Skip to content
Ahmc Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ahmc Health Foundation

The AHMC HEALTH FOUNDATION exists to improve the quality of life for people in the communities served by ahmc-affiliated hospitals.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$153kHealth$116kHuman Services$20kEducation$13k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$10,000
ASIAN YOUTH CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%YMCA OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 3 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +135% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$188k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%
-19%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley
    6× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +86%
  • AY
    ASIAN YOUTH CENTER
    4× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +135%
  • ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • BT
    BUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $46k · revenue +10%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -38%
  • PL
    PARKVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue ×17
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

—
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
6
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
7
Clinica Msr Oscar a Romero

See schedule oour mission is to provide quality, affordable, community-sensitive health care and other services to the underserved communities of greater los angeles, regardless of their ability to pay, by upholding the legacy and…

Health
8
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
9
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Union of Pan Asian Communities

To improve the general well-being and education of the asian, pacific islander and other ethnic communities of san diego county. upac recognizes the diverse ethnic and cultural identities and strengths of these communities and their need…

Human Services
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Alliance of Pasadena; the most unlike its peers is Young Mens Christian Association of West San Gabriel Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley: $122,500 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel ValleyCITY OF MONTEREY PARK: $10,000 · OtherCITY OF MONTEREY PARKASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesASIAN YOUTH CENTERYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN A…ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $25,000 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SER…PARKVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthPARKVIEW LEGACY FO…COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA: $10,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH A…BUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $46,000 · InternationalBUDDHIST TZU CHI …Claremont Graduate University: $12,500 · Education
Other$132,500Human Services$60,000Health$50,000International$46,000Education$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley: $122,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahmc Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahmc Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ahmc Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ahmc Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ahmc Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home