Skip to content
Agnich Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Agnich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$221k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$531kReligion$83kPhilanthropy$63kPublic Benefit$39kArts & Culture$29kHealth$22kEnvironment$20kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $119k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$118,500
Individual grant recipient$35,000
ST PHILIPS SCHOOL & COMMUNITY CENTER$20,000
UPLIFT EDUCATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SF$10,000
PINEWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
CASTILLEJA SCHOOL$5,000
SMU TOWER CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HUNTINGTON DISEASE SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
UT
KY
VA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 16 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
27

Total granted

$1.3M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+14%

Still filing today

63%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $217k · revenue +102%
  • PH
    PRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $83k · revenue +501%
  • CS
    CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $31k
  • CP
    COMMIT PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
5
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
6
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
7
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Institute for the Future

Institute for the future is the world's leading futures organization. our mission is to prepare the world to create better, more equitable futures by disrupting short-term thinking with visions of transformative possibilities.

Education
12
Equitable Facilities Fund Inc

Eff is a nonprofit social impact fund that believes all children deserve a quality education. we empower high-performing public charter schools with equitable access to low-cost, long-term financing by innovatively combining…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Beginnings Cat Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $543,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $225,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN: $82,500 · OtherPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDNST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $40,000 · Other+28 more: $183,100 · Other+28 moreUPLIFT EDUCATION: $217,000 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $190,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELA…CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $57,500 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONTHE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $18,500 · Education+4 more: $30,000 · Education+4 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $59,860 · Philanthropy+2 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyIndependent Women's Forum: $38,500 · Civil RightsDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentNEW BEGINNINGS CAT RESCUE: $15,000 · AnimalsOUR RESCUE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,074,600Education$513,500Philanthropy$62,860Civil Rights$38,500Environment$20,000Animals$15,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $217,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $190,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN: $82,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $59,860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetIndependent Women's Forum: $38,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS CAT RESCUE: $15,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $10,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENHILL SCHOOL: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF DALLAS ANIMAL SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAYLOR'S GIFT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Communities Foundatio…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Ayco Charitable F…The Dallas FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Silicon Valley Commun…Raymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…United Way WorldwideVerizon Foundation
Texas Instruments FoundationTX16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agnich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agnich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agnich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home