Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Agnich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$531kReligion$83kPhilanthropy$63kPublic Benefit$39kArts & Culture$29kHealth$22kEnvironment$20kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$86,500
UPLIFT EDUCATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SF$10,000
CASTILLEJA SCHOOL$10,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$2,500
TAYLOR'S GIFT FOUNDATION$2,500
SMU TOWER CENTER$1,000
HUNTINGTON DISEASE SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
CA
UT
KY
VA
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $202k · revenue +102%
  • PH
    PRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $83k · revenue +501%
  • CS
    CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $53k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $31k
  • CP
    COMMIT PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
3
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
6
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Institute for the Future

Institute for the future is the world's leading futures organization. our mission is to prepare the world to create better, more equitable futures by disrupting short-term thinking with visions of transformative possibilities.

Education
12
Equitable Facilities Fund Inc

Eff is a nonprofit social impact fund that believes all children deserve a quality education. we empower high-performing public charter schools with equitable access to low-cost, long-term financing by innovatively combining…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Beginnings Cat Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%57%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%23%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $425,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $190,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN — $82,500 · OtherPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDNIndividual grant recipient — $31,250 · Other+25 more — $144,350 · Other+25 moreUPLIFT EDUCATION — $202,000 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $190,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $52,500 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONTHE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO — $18,500 · Education+4 more — $30,000 · Education+4 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $59,860 · Philanthropy+2 more — $3,000 · PhilanthropyIndependent Women's Forum — $38,500 · Civil RightsDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentNEW BEGINNINGS CAT RESCUE — $15,000 · AnimalsOUR RESCUE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$873,600Education$493,500Philanthropy$62,860Civil Rights$38,500Environment$20,000Animals$15,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION — $202,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $190,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN — $82,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $59,860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $52,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIndependent Women's Forum — $38,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO — $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS CAT RESCUE — $15,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOODSON CENTER — $10,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENHILL SCHOOL — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAYLOR'S GIFT FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF DALLAS ANIMAL SERVICES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNo One Left Behind — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Communities Foundatio…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Ayco Charitable F…The Dallas FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Silicon Valley Commun…Raymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…United Way WorldwideVerizon Foundation
Texas Instruments FoundationTX16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Agnich Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home