Skip to content
Agency on AgingArea 4 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Agency on AgingArea 4

Enriching the lives of older adults and people with disabilities by fostering networks of support, advocating for individual choice, collaborating with others, ensuring equity, and striving to do so with conviction.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$43MHuman Services$25MCrime & Legal$9.1MHealth$5.5MHousing & Shelter$1.0MPublic Benefit$608kCommunity Improvement$418kReligion$101k
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+13 grants · $17M
$237,707
Median grant
1
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOW by ACC$7,017,198
Seniors First$2,133,029
LSNC$1,516,420
Del Oro$1,131,982
MOWS by PRI$1,051,530
Gold County Community Service$873,819
ACC Senior Services$627,880
2 Bits Express Caf$454,295
Sierra Senior Services$432,540
FREED Center for Independent$402,117
Inc Seniors$313,510
Resources for Independent Liv$293,673
Drewskis$288,417
Las Brasas$237,707
YubaSutter Legal Center$223,818
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $19.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Seniors First: $2.1M → 6%Gold County Community Service: $874k → 11%Inc Seniors: $390k → 12%CARING CHOICES: $106k → 18%Seniors First: $1.1M → 6%Gold County Community Service: $789k → 11%INC SENIOR CITIZENS OF SIERRA COUNTY: $345k → 12%CARING CHOICES: $103k → 18%SENIORS FIRST: $1.1M → 6%GOLD COUNTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $598k → 11%Inc Seniors: $314k → 12%Seniors First: $1.0M → 6%Gold County Community Service: $549k → 11%Inc Seniors: $237k → 12%SENIORS FIRST: $849k → 6%GOLD COUNTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $398k → 11%INC SENIOR CITIZENS OF SIERRA CO: $135k → 12%SENIORS FIRST: $796k → 6%GOLD COUNTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $329k → 11%SENIORS FIRST: $511k → 6%GOLD COUNTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $255k → 11%SENIORS FIRST: $282k → 6%GOLD COUNTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $251k → 11%Placer People of Faith: $129k → 6%YHAA: $206k → 16%Placer People of Faith: $113k → 6%YHAA: $193k → 16%YHAA: $163k → 16%Community Link: $233k → 12%Community Link: $190k → 12%FREED Center for Independent: $402k → 11%Community Link: $180k → 12%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $397k → 11%FREED Center for Independent: $304k → 11%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $171k → 12%FREED Center for Independent: $298k → 11%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $164k → 11%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $163k → 12%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $154k → 11%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $132k → 11%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $113k → 11%Resources for Independent Liv: $294k → 12%Resources for Independent Liv: $155k → 12%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $104k → 12%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $86k → 12%STANFORD SETTLEMENT NEIGHBORHOOD CTR: $104k → 12%Stanford Settlement: $96k → 12%Stanford Settlement: $91k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84M · 34 repeat orgs$764k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
6

Total granted

$84M
$655k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Meals on Wheels by ACC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +80% · 70% of their budget
  • LS
    LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.3M · revenue +89%
  • SF
    SENIORS FIRST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +154% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • VS
    Valley Services
    one grant, 2022 · $406k
  • RH
    RESCARE HOME CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $113k
  • CV
    Costa Vida Mexican Restaurant
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
2
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
3
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
4
Sierra Senior Providers Inc

Provide essential services to qualified seniors which includes nutritious meals for senior citizens of Tuolumne County.

Human Services
5
Sacramento Mountains Senior Services

To provide social services to senior citizens.

Human Services
6
Alzheimers Services of the East Bay

The mission of Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay is to provide services to individuals with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementia; provide support for their caregivers; and educate and inform the general community about issues…

Health
7
Senior Network Services Inc

Senior Network Services is a nonprofit agency providing senior citizens and persons with disabilities with information, guidance and assistance in coordinating existing resources to promote independence and the highest quality of life.

Human Services
8
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—
9
Redwood Coast Seniors Inc

Redwood Coast Seniors Inc. operates a senior center providing meals, transportation, day care, activities and support services that contribute to optimal wellness and healthy aging for all seniors on the Mendocino North Coast.

Human Services
10
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
11
Senior Access

Senior Access's mission is to help Marin's older and disabled adults remain independent and part of the community for as long as possible.

—
12
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Senior Services Dba Meals On Wheels Tahoe; the most unlike its peers is Wayfinder Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Meals on Wheels by ACC: $33,821,042 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels by ACCMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $4,442,151 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTYSENIORS FIRST INC: $7,767,789 · Human ServicesSENIORS FIRST INCGold Country Community Services: $4,042,659 · Human ServicesGold Country Community Servi…SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE: $2,243,364 · Human ServicesSIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA M…FREED Center for Independent Living Inc: $1,964,134 · Human ServicesFREED Center for Independent…INCORPORATED SENIOR CITIZENS OF SIERRA COUNTY: $1,641,781 · Human ServicesINCORPORATED SENIOR CITIZENS…Community Link Capital Region: $1,211,220 · Human ServicesCommunity Link Capital Regio…+7 more: $2,563,510 · Human Services+7 moreDEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTER: $6,939,305 · OtherDEL ORO CAREGIV…2 Bits Express Caf: $851,944 · Other2 Bits Express …Hospitality House: $607,128 · OtherPERSONALIZED HOMECARE: $591,620 · OtherLas Brasas: $530,876 · OtherDrewskis: $527,783 · OtherValley Services: $405,625 · Other+13 more: $1,246,418 · Other+13 moreLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8,293,508 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVIC…YUBA SUTTER LEGAL CENTER FOR SENIORS: $749,160 · Crime & LegalYUBA SUTTER …ASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES: $2,967,858 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTH: $265,867 · HealthDIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE: $194,796 · Health+1 more: $56,341 · HealthREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO: $630,195 · Housing & ShelterPlacer Independent Resource Services: $449,998 · Community Improvement
Food & Nutrition$38,263,193Human Services$21,434,457Other$11,700,699Crime & Legal$9,042,668Health$3,484,862Housing & Shelter$630,195Community Improvement$449,998

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMeals on Wheels by ACC: $33,821,042 over 8y, 70% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8,293,508 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetSENIORS FIRST INC: $7,767,789 over 8y, 59% of budgetDEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTER: $6,939,305 over 8y, 60% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $4,442,151 over 8y, 39% of budgetGold Country Community Services: $4,042,659 over 8y, 53% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES: $2,967,858 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE: $2,243,364 over 8y, 50% of budgetFREED Center for Independent Living Inc: $1,964,134 over 8y, 15% of budgetINCORPORATED SENIOR CITIZENS OF SIERRA COUNTY: $1,641,781 over 8y, 83% of budgetCommunity Link Capital Region: $1,211,220 over 8y, 13% of budgetYUBA SUTTER LEGAL CENTER FOR SENIORS: $749,160 over 8y, 50% of budgetSTANFORD SETTLEMENT INC: $635,215 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO: $630,195 over 8y, 12% of budgetResources for Independent Living Inc: $591,718 over 4y, 16% of budgetYolo Healthy Aging Alliance: $562,079 over 3y, 52% of budgetPlacer Independent Resource Services: $449,998 over 8y, 13% of budgetCaring Choices Inc: $297,196 over 4y, 11% of budgetPLACER PEOPLE OF FAITH TOGETHER: $277,211 over 3y, 74% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH: $265,867 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE: $194,796 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLilliput Children's Services: $155,031 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $103,365 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARATRANSIT SERVICES: $96,726 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC: $56,341 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEL HOGAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $52,931 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Meals on Wheels by ACC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds SENIORS FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds DEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Gold Country Community Services ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds FREED Center for Independent Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds INCORPORATED SENIOR CITIZENS OF SIERRA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Community Link Capital Region ↗
  • Who funds YUBA SUTTER LEGAL CENTER FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD SETTLEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO ↗
  • Who funds Resources for Independent Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Placer Independent Resource Services ↗
  • Who funds Caring Choices Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLACER PEOPLE OF FAITH TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE ↗
  • Who funds Lilliput Children's Services ↗
  • Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
  • Who funds PARATRANSIT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds EL HOGAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…United Way California…Dignity HealthSutter Valley Hospita…Sierra Health Foundat…Teichert FoundationSierra Health Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Meals on Wheels Ameri…Kelly FoundationDignity Community CareCalifornia Foundation…
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · Dignity Health · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Meals on Wheels America · Kelly Foundation · Dignity Community Care · California Foundation for Stronger Communities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agency on AgingArea 4 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agency on AgingArea 4. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agency on AgingArea 4’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home