Skip to content
AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation

To exclusively carry out charitable purposes related to and in support of construction industry promotion, training, education and related efforts.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$145kYouth Development$101kHuman Services$82kEmployment$45kFood & Nutrition$44kHealth$30kCommunity Improvement$30kInternational$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$41,953
Median grant
1
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OR & WA$41,953
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AGC CHARITIES INC: $24k → 7%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Oregon Community Foundation Trust

The oregon community foundation trust is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf). the trust makes grants that further the mission of ocf which is to improve the lives of all oregonians through the power of…

Philanthropy
2
Oregon Coast Community College Foundation

The primary purpose of the foundation is to advance and promote the interests and development of the oregon of the oregon coast community college, its students, faculty, and the community it serves.

Education
3
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Inc Oregon Chapter

The foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete doctoral degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
4
Oregon Student Foundation

Oregon student foundation is oregon student association's (osa) 501(c)(3) related organization that provides the additional support that the student led osa needs to ensure that every oregonian has access to a quality, affordable education.

Education
5
Portland YouthBuilders

To support young people who are committed to changing their lives to become self-sufficient, contributing members of the workforce and their community.

Youth Development
6
Lane County Community Foundation

The mission of Lane County Community Foundation (the Foundation) is to improve the quality of life in Lane County, Kansas and communities within Lane County, and to ensure that the communities in and around Lane County will forever remain…

Philanthropy
7
Oregon Association of Public Accountants Scholarsh
—
8
Oregon Northwest Workforce Investment Board

Advance a collaborative, solutions-based workforce system that positively impacts the prosperity of our communities by meeting the needs of business and industry through a skilled workforce.

Employment
9
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
10
Careers in Construction Sw Washington
Recreation & Sports
11
Oregon Made Creative Foundation

The Oregon Made Creative Foundation supports the efforts of storytellers, filmmakers, and artists statewide to attain sustainable careers in the arts, especially the digital arts. The Foundation, under its #OregonMade banner, strives to…

Arts & Culture
12
Oregon and Southern Idaho Laborers - Employers Training Trust Fund

Training, education and certification of unionized construction craft laborers and apprentices to make them more competitive.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Oregon Corps Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cascade Aids Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $50,000 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCHWITHERS LUMBER: $43,577 · OtherWITHERS LUMBEROregon-Columbia Chapter of the Assoc General Contractors of America: $25,000 · OtherOregon-Columbia Chapter of the Assoc G…KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGENATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION: $22,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN IN CONST…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherOregon State University Foundation: $100,000 · EducationOregon State University Fo…KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE …THE SCHWEIGER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · EducationTHE SCHWEIGER MEMORIAL SCH…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC: $69,608 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEM…GIRLS BUILD: $49,670 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS BUILDAGC CHARITIES INC: $24,220 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $8,050 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY WORKS INC: $25,000 · HealthCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $5,000 · HealthHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $22,500 · EmploymentMT ANGEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$170,577Education$120,000International$69,608Youth Development$49,670Human Services$32,270Health$30,000Employment$22,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon State University Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC: $69,608 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $50,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetGIRLS BUILD: $49,670 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetOregon-Columbia Chapter of the Assoc General Contractors of America: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAGC CHARITIES INC: $24,220 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMT ANGEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SCHWEIGER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Marie Lamfrom Charita…First Interstate Banc…Onpoint Community Cre…Washington Federal Fo…The Roundhouse Founda…The Ford Family Found…Charities Aid Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR21.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Washington Federal Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Community Works Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch: 45% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Klamath Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation?

Find your warmest path to AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home