Loading…
· Public charity
AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation
To exclusively carry out charitable purposes related to and in support of construction industry promotion, training, education and related efforts.
$42k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$42k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Education$120kInternational$70kYouth Development$50kHuman Services$32kHealth$30kEmployment$23kPhilanthropy$10kOther$171k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
girls
2019
girls
2020
—
2021
—
2022
settingveterans ranchworking ranchaged terminallyterminally illill veterans
2023
youthyoung
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$41,953
Median grant
1
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
- JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OR & WA$41,953
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Lane County Community Foundation
Community foundation
Philanthropy
2
Clatsop Community College Foundation
Foundation provides scholarships and other financial support to Clatsop Community College and its students.
—
3
Southwestern Oregon Workforce Investment
To coordinate workforce programs and services in coos, curry, and douglas counties, oregon through a network of local partners.
Employment
4
Eastern Oregon Workforce Board
To coordinate the resources need to help employers succeed and individuals to advance through innovation and partnerships.
Community Improvement
5
Eastern Oregon University Foundation
Established in 1964 for the philanthropic benefit of Eastern Oregon University, the Foundation raises funds to support the mission of Eastern Oregon University.
Education
6
Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance
Empowering innovation and collaboration with the independent healthcare professionals providing care to patients every day.
Health
7
Rogue Action Center
The Rogue Action Center builds organizing infrastructure, leaders, and community power for a just, inclusive, and sustainable Southern Oregon for everyone.
Community Improvement
8
World Affairs Council of Oregon dba WorldOregon
The mission of WorldOregon is to engage Oregonians with the world and broaden public awareness and understanding of international affairs.
International
9
Oregon and Southern Idaho Laborers -
Training, education, and certification of unionized construction laborers and apprentices.
Education
10
Clackamas River Basin Council Inc
The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed
Environment
11
Elevate Oregon
Elevating potential, building sustained relationships with urban youth, and charting paths to brighter futures.
Youth Development
12
Oregon Cancer Foundation
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Oregon Corps Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mt Angel Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$170,577Education$120,000International$69,608Youth Development$49,670Human Services$32,270Health$30,000Employment$22,500Philanthropy$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OSU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
- Who funds GIRLS BUILD ↗
- Who funds AGC - OREGON COLUMBIA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS - THE DUNN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds AGC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds SCHWEIGER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHI ↗
- Who funds MT ANGEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Oregon Community FoundationOR21.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 371755279 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation?
Find your warmest path to AGC Oregon Columbia Chapter Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines