Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

After God's Heart Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$822kHuman Services$434kRecreation & Sports$195kPhilanthropy$95kFood & Nutrition$88kReligion$87kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STREET HOPE TN$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
SHOW HOPE$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CARRIES HEART: $20k → 16%KEATON FRANKLIN COKER FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%HOPE HEALS: $15k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
CA
NE
KY
VA
TN
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 8 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalReligionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue -7%
  • MP
    MERCY PROJECT INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $326k · revenue -11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2021 · $202k

Funded once

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • TF
    THE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • FT
    FEEDING THE ORPHANS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Every Orphans Hope

We exist to glorify God through the church and see orphans raised to life in Christ, in a home, in a family, and in a community where they are known and loved.

Religion
2
Hope's Promise Inc

To strengthen families through ethical, christ-centered foster care, adoption, and global orphan care.

Human Services
3
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
4
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
5
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
6
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

7
Bless an Orphan

The mission of the organization is to find rescue and transform the lives of orphaned and abandoned children victims of human trafficking and those who are at risk or are living in abject poverty through educational spiritual psychological…

Human Services
8
Hopeland

Hopeland pioneers innovative solutions and builds new partnerships to prevent family separation, reunify children who are separated from their families, and mobilize a movement of families to support children who are growing up outside of…

Human Services
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
Family Hope International

Family hope international frees families from extreme poverty in africa by providing them with basic needs to sustain their lives and empowering them with a small business opportunity.

International
11
Hope for the Fatherless

HFTF serves orphaned and vulnerable children in Ethiopia, and its mission is to see every child thriving in a loving family. HFTF accomplishes this through five primary initiatives: in-country adoption training and placement, family…

International
12
Children's HopeChest

Inspired by Christ's love, Children's HopeChest releases the potential existing within vulnerable communities, starting with the children.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Keaton F Coker Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $350,000 · Human ServicesSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPEMERCY PROJECT INC — $325,500 · Human ServicesMERCY PROJECT INC+5 more — $78,100 · Human Services+5 moreIndividual grant recipient — $201,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMOR MINISTRIES INC — $150,000 · OtherAMOR MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient — $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMOR — $78,000 · OtherAMORTHE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherTHE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH+6 more — $81,000 · Other+6 moreSTREET HOPE TN — $195,000 · Recreation & SportsSTREET HOPE …Eagle Mount — $95,000 · PhilanthropyLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $40,000 · InternationalFEEDING THE ORPHANS INC — $25,000 · InternationalANSWERS IN GENESIS INC — $15,000 · ReligionDEEPER STILL — $10,000 · ReligionCROSSROADS — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterBreakthrough Corporation D/B/A Autism Breakthrough of Knoxville — $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$753,600Other$630,500Recreation & Sports$195,000Philanthropy$95,000International$65,000Religion$25,000Housing & Shelter$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $350,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY PROJECT INC — $325,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetSTREET HOPE TN — $195,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetAMOR MINISTRIES INC — $150,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetEagle Mount — $95,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING THE ORPHANS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE KEATON F COKER FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARRIES HEART — $20,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetCROSSROADS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHope Heals Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEEPER STILL — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGIVE CLEAN WATER INC — $8,100 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBreakthrough Corporation D/B/A Autism Breakthrough of Knoxville — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Trinity Health Foundation of East Tennessee · East Tennessee Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization After God's Heart Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph