Skip to content
Aftab and Gul Cumber Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Aftab and Gul Cumber Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$2.2MHealth$80kYouth Development$65kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$3kCommunity Improvement$200Education$200Housing & Shelter$150Other$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$750
Median grant
5
States reached
$511k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA$200,000
AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA$43,200
AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA$10,000
FOCUS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE USA$10,000
JUBILEE MONUMENTS CORP$10,000
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC$6,000
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $10k → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $9k → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $9k → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $8k → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $8k → 5%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $750 → 5%Non Pareil Institute: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 8 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$2.4M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+62%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NONPAREIL INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +61%
  • JM
    JUBILEE MONUMENTS CORP
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +3%
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $75 · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR A BETTER LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +89%
  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT EDUCATION WORLDWIDE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Health Foundation
—
2
Foundation for Human Enrichment

Support trauma resolution and resilience through culturally responsive professional training, research, education and outreach in diverse global communities.

Unclassified
3
HDIInc

HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.

International
4
Health Strategy and Delivery Foundation

To be the leading thought partner and trusted advisor to a multitude of stakeholders for developing effective solutions and driving transformative impact in the health and social sector in Nigeria and the African Continent.

International
5
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
6
Lifebox Foundation Inc

To improve the safety of healthcare in low and middle-income countries.

Philanthropy
7
World Health Foundation

We are supporting health initiatives worldwide.

Health
8
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
9
Wellness for Humanity Foundation
—
10
Amar International Charitable Foundation in the Usa D/B/a Aspire International

Aspire international's purposes is to relieve poverty, distress or suffering by providing medical, rehabilitative, financial, public health, or educational assistance to individuals or communities in any part of the world, in particularly…

—
11
Sign Fracture Care International

Sign partners with overseas surgeons to build sustainable orthopaedic capacity by donating education, instruments, and implants. by working with teaching hospitals and hosting educational conferences worldwide, sign equips surgeons to heal…

Health
12
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Hemophilia Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for a Better Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,128,250 · InternationalAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USAFocus Humanitarian Assistance USA: $80,000 · International+2 more: $650 · InternationalNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $70,500 · Human ServicesJUBILEE MONUMENTS CORP: $65,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsFOUNDATION FOR A BETTER LIFE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION TO SUPPORT EDUCATION WORLDWIDE: $1,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $275 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,323 · HealthHope Foundation for Women Child of Bangladesh Inc: $600 · Health+3 more: $650 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $1,750 · OtherSpecial Olympics Broward County Florida: $1,250 · OtherIndus Hospital: $500 · OtherNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $200 · OtherHabitat for Humanity: $150 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherBroward Education Foundation Inc: $200 · Education
International$2,208,900Human Services$70,500Recreation & Sports$65,250Philanthropy$11,275Health$8,573Other$3,950Education$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $2,128,250 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFocus Humanitarian Assistance USA: $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $70,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUBILEE MONUMENTS CORP: $65,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,323 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope Foundation for Women Child of Bangladesh Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHearing the Call Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Broward Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Shell USA Company Fou…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aftab and Gul Cumber Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aftab and Gul Cumber Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aftab and Gul Cumber Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home