Skip to content

· Public charity

Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp

Aua transforms food access, local economies, community wellness, and climate resiliency in chicagoland, through policy advocacy, education and resources to safely grow medicine and food.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$539kHealth$20kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $183,056, the rows itemized in this filing. The $204,056 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $176k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORSPACE$25,000
GETTING GROWN COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED NFP$20,000
CEDILLOS FRESH PRODUCE$20,000
WOOD ST COLLECTIVE$20,000
DUSABLE CITY BOTANICAL FARMS LLC$20,000
LITTLE VILLAGE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ORG$20,000
CHICAGO PATCHWORK FARMS$10,556
MAMA MOORE REGENERATION CENTER NFP$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
IYABO FARMS$10,000
SISTAS IN THE VILLAGE$10,000
CENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 5 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +72% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
19

Total granted

$223k
$247k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+72%

Still filing today

80%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • N
    NEIGHBORSPACE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $87k · revenue +48%
  • LV
    Little Village Environmental Justice Org
    2× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +74%
  • RA
    RUN A WAY BUCKERS CLUB INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • FT
    FRESHER TOGETHER
    one grant, 2020 · $31k
  • GF
    GODLY FARMING LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • UF
    URBAN FARMING INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
2
Black Seeds

prove asset to organic food

Food & Nutrition
3
The Neighborhood Garden Project

We cultivate people through presence, soil, and shared work. The Neighborhood Garden Project exists to help individuals reconnect with identity, healing, and belonging by creating thoughtful spaces where people return to who they are…

Human Services
4
Healthy Harvest Community Garden
Environment
5
Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc

The organization is committed to developing a sustainable community food system by bringing together diverse groups of people, with a focus on youth development, to establish community gardens, urban agriculture and community green spaces.…

Religion
6
The Grow Collective

The Grow Collective grows people, grows community, and grows a healthier planet. We offer wellness and skill building activities that enhance self-esteem, anchor self-worth, and empower individuals. We bring people together in safe spaces…

Food & Nutrition
7
Sustainable Growers
—
8
Urban Harvest Stl

Urban Harvest STL builds community around inclusive and resilient local food systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Audubon Neighborhood Association

The Audubon Neighborhood Association ANA works to strengthen the quality of life and community resiliency for all in the Audubon Neighborhood by facilitating community engagement and relationships and helping all members of the…

Environment
10
Minneapolis Climate Action

Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…

Environment
11
Go Green Meridian

We are a Community Garden; we teach people how to grow food organically and sustainably.

Food & Nutrition
12
Brightside Produce

Brightside aims to increase access to healthy food in urban food deserts by delivering produce to small corner stores in under serviced areas. Support is garnered by home delivery customers who each week receive fresh produce and pay a…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wood St Collective; the most unlike its peers is Run a Way Buckers Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRESHER TOGETHER: $31,000 · OtherFRESHER TOGETHERJUAN CARLOS CEDILLO-PEREZ: $30,000 · OtherJUAN CARLOS CEDILLO-PEREZGODLY FARMING LLC: $22,222 · OtherGODLY FARMING LLCURBAN FARMING INITIATIVE: $20,000 · OtherURBAN FARMING INITIATIVEOBODO FARMS COCJ OKEKE: $20,000 · OtherOBODO FARMS COCJ OKEKEDUSABLE CITY BOTANICAL FARMS LLC: $20,000 · OtherDUSABLE CITY BOTANICAL FARMS LLCTHE GREEN LOTS PROJECT: $20,000 · OtherTHE GREEN LOTS PROJECTSUNFLOWER SOULE FARM LLC: $20,000 · OtherSUNFLOWER SOULE FARM LLCST SABINA CHURCH: $12,500 · Other+14 more: $122,224 · Other+14 moreNEIGHBORSPACE: $87,400 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORSPACEResilience Partners NFP: $10,000 · Community ImprovementResilience Partners…GETTING GROWN COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED NFP: $39,000 · EnvironmentGETTING GRO…Wood St Collective: $20,000 · EnvironmentWood St Col…Little Village Environmental Justice Org: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsRUN A WAY BUCKERS CLUB INC: $26,667 · Youth DevelopmentUN NUEVO DESPERTAR A NEW AWAKENING NFP: $10,000 · HealthJULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$317,946Community Improvement$97,400Environment$59,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Youth Development$26,667Health$20,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORSPACE: $87,400 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetLittle Village Environmental Justice Org: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGETTING GROWN COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED NFP: $39,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetRUN A WAY BUCKERS CLUB INC: $26,667 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetResilience Partners NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORSPACE ↗
  • Who funds Little Village Environmental Justice Org ↗
  • Who funds GETTING GROWN COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED NFP ↗
  • Who funds RUN A WAY BUCKERS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Wood St Collective ↗
  • Who funds UN NUEVO DESPERTAR A NEW AWAKENING NFP ↗
  • Who funds Resilience Partners NFP ↗
  • Who funds JULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ForefrontIL21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Forefront · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp?

    Find your warmest path to Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Advocates for Urban Agriculture Nfp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph