Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp

The mission of ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPoration is to servethe health needs of individuals, families and communities though awholistic philosopy rooted in our fundamental understanding of humanbeings as created in the image of god.

$902k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$728k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$89MPublic Benefit$2.2MCommunity Improvement$2.1MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$963kYouth Development$839kArts & Culture$476kPhilanthropy$327kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $247k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$23.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION$727,759
JAYS HOPE INC$486,000
ENDURE CHARITIES INC$150,000
FAMILY CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER$97,000
IMANI VILLAGE (TRINITY UNITED CHURCH)$42,835
SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS$35,000
CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION$27,500
PUDDLE PROJECT$16,700
CHOOSE DUPAGE$10,000
GILDAS CLUB CHICAGO$10,000
CYN COUNSELING CENTER$7,660
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$7,500
HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,500
CRYSTAL LAKE CHAMBER OF COMM$7,265
PARK RIDGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IL$7,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES- MCHENRY COUNTY PADS: $40k → 6%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER: $27k → 14%PIONEER CTR FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $15k → 6%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER: $15k → 14%YWCA MCLEAN COUNTY: $16k → 11%COUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATIONS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $15k → 7%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $23k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $14k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITY (OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA): $9k → 7%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $20k → 14%EQUALITY ILLINOIS INSTITUTE: $13k → 14%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 14%EQUALITY ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER SO SUBURBIA CORP: $9k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $10k → 14%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $14k → 14%PUDDLE PROJECT: $17k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $35k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $15k → 14%IMANI VILLAGE (TRINITY UNITED CHURCH): $43k → 14%FUNDING FOR TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $40k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $40k → 14%BETHEL NEW LIFE: $35k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 14%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $23k → 14%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $20k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $35k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $30k → 14%SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS: $20k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $15k → 14%RESPOND NOW INC: $15k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON (AGING INC): $16k → 14%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 14%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 14%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $23k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $10k → 14%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%UCAN: $35k → 14%UCAN: $30k → 14%UCAN: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
MO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 95% of Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 5% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Advocate Health and Hospitals Corplessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 107 repeat orgs$78M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

107 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 93 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
98

Total granted

$22M
$77M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+18%

Still filing today

88%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $638k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +136%
  • LG
    LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO
    2× · 2020–2022 · $800k · revenue +31% · 40% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $430k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AH
    ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $75M · revenue -89% · 39% of their budget
  • CC
    CHICAGO CARES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -62%
  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +343%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
3
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
4
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
5
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
6
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
7
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
10
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
11
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is The Adtalem Global Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Business AdvocacyChicago Arts OrganizationsCommunity Health ServicesEmergency Assistance & Hous…Disability and Senior Servi…Christian Ministry Organiza…Youth Development ProgramsFamily Support ServicesEarly Childhood Care CentersFamily Philanthropic Founda…Industry Trade AssociationsCivil Rights & Justice Advo…Independent K-12 SchoolsSupportive Housing & Homele…Professional & Trade Associ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr17%6%20–35yr14%89%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/215
the rest of the field
15%
5,696/37,676

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

179 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 179 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
174/179
Grantees still filing
123/179
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK — $75,000,000 · HealthADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORKILLINOIS HOSPITAL RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $7,887,708 · HealthILLINOIS HOSPITAL RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION+25 more — $5,016,708 · Health+25 moreVILLAGE OF OAK LAWN — $2,113,305 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $311,859 · Other+96 more — $4,219,683 · OtherJAYS HOPE — $486,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NETWORK — $288,108 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation — $120,000 · EducationYoung Mens Educational Network — $105,000 · EducationNEWROOT LEARNING INSTITUTE F/K/A UMOJA STUDENT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $105,000 · EducationKIPP CHICAGO SCHOOLS — $97,500 · EducationLEGAL PREP CHARTER ACADEMIES — $97,500 · Education+24 more — $725,082 · EducationMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC — $97,500 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesUCAN — $95,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH SUBURBAN PADS — $95,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN — $72,500 · Human ServicesCIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES — $72,500 · Human ServicesPioneer Center for Human Services — $55,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA — $54,115 · Human ServicesTRINITY UCC CHILD CARE CENTER — $52,835 · Human ServicesCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER — $49,419 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO — $45,000 · Human ServicesILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER — $42,405 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $38,172 · Human Services+13 more — $193,025 · Human ServicesCHICAGO CARES INC — $250,000 · Community ImprovementWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $212,540 · Community ImprovementDUPAGEBIZ — $80,000 · Community ImprovementAlliance of Local Service Organizations — $65,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORSPACE — $55,000 · Community ImprovementILLINOIS BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP DBA ILLINOIS ECONOMIC D — $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL AREA — $42,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $29,680 · Community Improvement+3 more — $29,175 · Community ImprovementLEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO — $800,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $9,820 · Public BenefitENDURE CHARITIES INC — $275,000 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $215,933 · Arts & CultureTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC — $18,548 · Arts & Culture
Health$87,904,416Other$6,644,847Education$2,024,190Human Services$1,107,471Community Improvement$813,395Public Benefit$809,820Arts & Culture$529,481

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK — $75,000,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetILLINOIS HOSPITAL RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $7,887,708 over 4y, 13% of budgetDUPAGE HEALTH COALITION — $2,920,277 over 8y, 20% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO — $800,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetJAYS HOPE — $486,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $429,897 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $351,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK — $288,108 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetENDURE CHARITIES INC — $275,000 over 3y, 79% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center — $256,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $254,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $215,933 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $212,540 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN — $201,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCommunity Health NFP — $138,939 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $137,973 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHealthy Schools Campaign — $124,470 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $115,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC — $115,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION — $112,579 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT — $105,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYoung Mens Educational Network — $105,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFREE SPIRIT MEDIA NFP — $105,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEWROOT LEARNING INSTITUTE F/K/A UMOJA STUDENT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $105,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetWEST TOWN BIKES NFP — $102,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKIPP CHICAGO SCHOOLS — $97,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL PREP CHARTER ACADEMIES — $97,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC — $97,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Christian Health Center Inc — $97,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MOMS INC — $95,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUCAN — $95,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUILD INC — $95,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH SUBURBAN PADS — $95,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $94,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO — $92,800 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM — $91,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO UNITED — $89,113 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHICAGO LAWNDALE AMACHI MENTORING PROGRAM — $87,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetInstitute for Nonviolence Chicago — $85,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDUPAGEBIZ — $80,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER — $80,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGIRLS IN THE GAME NFP — $75,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN — $72,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPARK RIDGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $70,978 over 3y, 44% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…The Chicago Community…Circle of Service Fou…Robert R McCormick Fo…Polk Bros Foundation …Greater Chicago Food …ForefrontJohn D and Catherine …Northwestern Memorial…Arie and Ida Crown Me…George M Eisenberg Fo…Lloyd a Fry Foundation
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL71.5× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Forefront · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Lloyd a Fry Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    54report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home