Skip to content
Advanced Medical Technology Association at a glance

· Public charity

Advanced Medical Technology Association

Advamed advocates on a global basis for the highest ethical standards, timely patient access to safe and effective medical technologies, and economic policies that reward value creation.

$479k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MEducation$95kCrime & Legal$75kArts & Culture$60kCommunity Improvement$52kEmployment$50kPublic Benefit$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $459,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $479,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $396k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC$50,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK$45,000
RESEARCHAMERICA$35,000
ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH$35,000
FOGARTY INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION$30,000
MARCH OF DIMES INC$27,500
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$25,000
ASSOCIATION OF BLACK CARDIOLOGISTS INC$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT (AIM)$25,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$20,000
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION$20,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC$15,000
PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION$12,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT$11,000
SOCIETY FOR WOMENS HEALTH RESEARCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 27 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$1.9M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+20%

Still filing today

93%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitEducationCrime & LegalInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $305k · revenue +88%
  • R
    RESEARCHAMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $297k · revenue +135%
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • TF
    TAX FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +41%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR WOMENS HEALTH RESEARCH
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
3
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
9
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
10
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health
11
The American Neurological Association

Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.

Health
12
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Women's Health Research; the most unlike its peers is MedTech & BioTech Veterans Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
32/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $305,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCHRESEARCHAMERICA: $297,000 · OtherRESEARCHAMERICAJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $175,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONALMedTech & BioTech Veterans Program Inc: $50,000 · Other+11 more: $146,300 · Other+11 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $151,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION …Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn: $72,000 · HealthPrevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer R…NATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $65,000 · HealthNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH RESOURCE CENTE…MEDTECH COLOR: $50,000 · HealthMEDTECH COLORSOCIETY FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH: $50,000 · HealthSOCIETY FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCHMARCH OF DIMES INC: $42,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCFOGARTY INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION: $40,000 · HealthFOGARTY INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATIONLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INCSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $30,000 · HealthEVERYLIFE FOUNDATION FOR RARE DISEASES: $27,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 · HealthASSOCIATION OF BLACK CARDIOLOGISTS INC: $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $25,000 · Health+6 more: $81,000 · Health+6 moreUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $120,000 · Public BenefitNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $20,000 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Public BenefitGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationMedtechWomen: $15,000 · EducationWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $52,000 · Community Improvement
Other$973,300Health$723,500Public Benefit$155,000Education$90,000Crime & Legal$75,000Arts & Culture$60,000Community Improvement$52,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $305,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA: $297,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $151,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPrevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn: $72,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $52,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMedTech & BioTech Veterans Program Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMEDTECH COLOR: $50,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetSOCIETY FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH: $50,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $42,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOGARTY INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION: $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe AIDS Institute Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEVERYLIFE FOUNDATION FOR RARE DISEASES: $27,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Health Council Inc: $26,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF BLACK CARDIOLOGISTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP: $19,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Cancer Research: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMedtechWomen: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEnvironmental Council of States Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH FORUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bryce Harlow Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Biotechnology Innovat…Association for Acces…AARPAmerican Medical Asso…Edwards Lifesciences …American Heart Associ…The Pfizer Foundation…The Robert Wood Johns…Morgan Stanley Global…Silicon Valley Commun…Charities Aid Foundat…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC38.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Biotechnology Innovation Organization · Association for Accessible Medicines · AARP · American Medical Association · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Advanced Medical Technology Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Advanced Medical Technology Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Advanced Medical Technology Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home