· Private foundation
Adler Schuppert Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $2,500 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC | $1,000 |
| ARIZONA LAND AND WATER TRUST INC | $1,000 |
| CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE | $1,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $1,000 |
| SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SOUTHERN ARIZONA ADAPTIVE SPORTS | $1,000 |
| PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING INC | $1,000 |
| THE NATURE CONVSERVANCY | $1,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE4× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +4%
- SASOUTHERN ARIZONA ADAPTIVE SPORTS2× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +132%
- PCPima Council on Aging4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +4%
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.
The Coalition's mission is to protect the biodiversity of the Sonoran Desert in Southern Arizona through science-based advocacy, education, and collaboration.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Arizona Forward brings business and civic leaders together to promote cooperative efforts to improve the environmental sustainability and economic vitality of our state and local regions.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
To improve greater tucson and the state of arizona by bringing together resources and leadership to enhance the economic climate and quality of life in our communities.
Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).
AriSEIAs mission is to develop and support policies that create opportunities to advance Arizonas economy through solar energy and storage. AriSEIA advocates for sustainable job creation in deployment of solar and complementary…
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ARIZONA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Pima Council on Aging ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LAND AND WATER TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Adler Schuppert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adler Schuppert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Adler Schuppert Family’s filings →