Skip to content
Adecco Group US Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Adecco Group US Charities Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$501k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$771kHuman Services$703kCommunity Improvement$175kCivil Rights$139kHealth$81kHousing & Shelter$51kEducation$35kYouth Development$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $387k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dress for Success Worldwide$162,000
Girls Who Code$100,000
National Urban League$75,000
Women Business Collaborative$50,000
Paradigm for Parity Inc$40,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS CHARLOTTE$20,000
Expect Miracles Foundation Inc$20,000
Dreams Come True$10,000
TWO BY TWO CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT$5,000
RETHREADED INC$5,000
VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JACKSONVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC$2,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS TWIN CITIES$1,000
Five Star Veterans Center Inc$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $670k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Girls Who Code: $10k → 17%Rethreaded Inc: $50k → 14%DRESS FOR SUCCESS CHARLOTTE: $20k → 10%DRESS FOR SUCCESS CHARLOTTE: $7k → 10%DRESS FOR SUCCESS CHARLOTTE: $5k → 10%JACKSONVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2k → 14%Girls Who Code: $152k → 17%Girls Who Code: $100k → 17%Girls Who Code: $80k → 17%Jacksonville Urban League: $35k → 14%National Urban League: $75k → 17%Paradigm For Parity Inc: $60k → 17%RETHREADED INC: $10k → 14%National Urban League: $15k → 17%RETHREADED INC: $5k → 14%Paradigm for Parity Inc: $40k → 17%RETHREADED INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
CA
VA
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 13 repeat orgs$453k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$1.6M
$441k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+19%

Still filing today

92%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $342k · revenue +27%
  • PF
    PARADIGM FOR PARITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +10%
  • NU
    NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TC
    Tides Center
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • JU
    Jacksonville Urban League Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • Path Forward
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dress for Success San Francisco

Dress for success san francisco/san jose empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire, and development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.

Civil Rights
2
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
3
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
4
Dress for Success Phoenix

To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and the development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.

Human Services
5
Forum of Executive Women

Our core mission is to bring together, and leverage the influence of, professional women to expand the impact and power of women in the workplace and beyond.our vision is that women will achieve (continued on schedule o)equitable…

—
6
Dress for Success Central New Jersey

The organization is dedicated to empowering women to achieve economicindependence by providing professional attire, a network of support and thedevelopment tools to help women thrive in work and in life.

Human Services
7
Dress for Success Palm Beaches

Provides professional attire, a network of support and career development tools to help disadvantaged women in their pursuit of work

Human Services
8
Women Employed

To improve the economic status of women and remove barriers to economic equity.

Employment
9
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
10
Towards Employment Inc

We champion the potential of every person to succeed in a rewarding career, while working to create an equitable and inclusive workforce for tomorrow. we do this by providing skill development for in demand jobs, comprehensive supports,…

Employment
11
Dress for Success Seattle

The mission of dress for success seattle is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support professional attire and the development tools to help women thrive in work and in life.

Employment
12
Business Volunteers Unlimited

Bringing businesses and nonprofits together to provide board participation opportunities, volunteer referrals, and training to strengthen the overall performance of nonprofits primarily in northeast ohio.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $713,500 · InternationalDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDEGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $341,500 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INCPARADIGM FOR PARITY: $100,000 · Human ServicesPARADIGM FOR PARITYNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INCRethreaded Inc: $69,500 · Human ServicesRethreaded IncJacksonville Urban League Inc: $37,000 · Human ServicesJacksonville Urban League IncDress for Success Charlotte: $31,500 · Human ServicesTides Center: $250,000 · OtherTides CenterDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $40,000 · OtherDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKS…Jacksonville Urban League Inc: $25,000 · OtherJacksonville Urban League…Destination Home: $25,000 · OtherDestination HomeLarrain Segil Scholars Foundation: $25,000 · OtherLarrain Segil Scholars Fo…+19 more: $101,193 · Other+19 moreWOMEN BUSINESS COLLABORATIVE: $75,000 · EmploymentPath Forward: $25,000 · Employment+1 more: $1,000 · EmploymentEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,670 · PhilanthropyDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $500 · Housing & ShelterTwo By Two Character Development: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentDISTINGUISHED YOUNG WOMEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth Development
International$713,500Human Services$669,500Other$466,193Employment$101,000Philanthropy$36,670Housing & Shelter$25,500Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $713,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $341,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPARADIGM FOR PARITY: $100,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN BUSINESS COLLABORATIVE: $75,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetRethreaded Inc: $69,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJacksonville Urban League Inc: $37,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetDress for Success Charlotte: $31,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPath Forward: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTwo By Two Character Development: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISTINGUISHED YOUNG WOMEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $1,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS TWIN CITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBTG COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE STAR VETERANS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKERIS KARES INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…Jacksonville Jaguars …Csx Foundation IncPga Tour IncTruist Foundation IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA16.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adecco Group US Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adecco Group US Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Jacksonville Urban League Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Adecco Group US Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Adecco Group US Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adecco Group US Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home