· Private foundation
Adecco Group US Charities Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $387k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dress for Success Worldwide | $162,000 |
| Girls Who Code | $100,000 |
| National Urban League | $75,000 |
| Women Business Collaborative | $50,000 |
| Paradigm for Parity Inc | $40,000 |
| DRESS FOR SUCCESS CHARLOTTE | $20,000 |
| Expect Miracles Foundation Inc | $20,000 |
| Dreams Come True | $10,000 |
| TWO BY TWO CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| RETHREADED INC | $5,000 |
| VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC | $5,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC | $2,000 |
| DRESS FOR SUCCESS TWIN CITIES | $1,000 |
| Five Star Veterans Center Inc | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $670k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GIRLS WHO CODE INC4× · 2020–2024 · $342k · revenue +27%- PFPARADIGM FOR PARITY2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +10%
- NUNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- TCTides Centerone grant, 2021 · $250k
- DHDestination Homeone grant, 2020 · $25k
- JUJacksonville Urban League Incone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dress for success san francisco/san jose empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire, and development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.
Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and the development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.
Our core mission is to bring together, and leverage the influence of, professional women to expand the impact and power of women in the workplace and beyond.our vision is that women will achieve (continued on schedule o)equitable…
The organization is dedicated to empowering women to achieve economicindependence by providing professional attire, a network of support and thedevelopment tools to help women thrive in work and in life.
Provides professional attire, a network of support and career development tools to help disadvantaged women in their pursuit of work
To improve the economic status of women and remove barriers to economic equity.
To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.
We champion the potential of every person to succeed in a rewarding career, while working to create an equitable and inclusive workforce for tomorrow. we do this by providing skill development for in demand jobs, comprehensive supports,…
The mission of dress for success seattle is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support professional attire and the development tools to help women thrive in work and in life.
Bringing businesses and nonprofits together to provide board participation opportunities, volunteer referrals, and training to strengthen the overall performance of nonprofits primarily in northeast ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
- Who funds PARADIGM FOR PARITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN BUSINESS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Rethreaded Inc ↗
- Who funds DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Urban League Inc ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success Charlotte ↗
- Who funds EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Path Forward ↗
- Who funds Two By Two Character Development ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds DISTINGUISHED YOUNG WOMEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds BTG COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds KERIS KARES INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adecco Group US Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jacksonville Urban League Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Adecco Group US Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Adecco Group US Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.