Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adam E Naab Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$32kHuman Services$30kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$4kEducation$3kYouth Development$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Religion$300Other$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k13 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$210k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POTTERS WHEEL$43,000
UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME$3,000
HILLCREST YOUTH SERVICES$3,000
EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$500
Individual grant recipient$360
Individual grant recipient$200
Individual grant recipient$150
ROBINSON MIDDLE SCHOOL$150
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$100
ACCENT ON CHRIST$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $3k → 15%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $3k → 15%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $3k → 15%UNITED METHODIST YOUTH HOME: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$168k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+97%

Still filing today

45%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Potter's Wheel Inc
    4× · 2022–2026 · $51k · revenue +95%
  • UM
    United Methodist Youth Home Inc
    4× · 2022–2026 · $11k · revenue +38%
  • HW
    Hillcrest Washington Youth Home Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +173%
  • WC
    WEEKDAY CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
2
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
3
Elite Family Systems Inc

Elite Family Systems, Inc. (EFS) provides 24-hour residential care in four therapeutic treatment homes. Residential Treatment Homes for male clients, ages 7 through 21 and also provides additional services to Non-minor Dependents pursuant…

Human Services
4
Evangelical Children's Home

Partnering with the community to assist children, youth and families in their unique pursuit of health and wholeness through quality, professional and faithful services.

Human Services
5
Boys Town New York Inc

Changing the way America cares for children and families.

—
6
Trinity Haven Inc

Trinity haven provides safe, affirming housing for lgbtq youth experiencing housing instability.

Human Services
7
Edelweiss House Inc

To engage families in activities centered around God for their sanctification.

Human Services
8
Trent Hill Center for Children & Families

To house children who have been removed from their homes due to abuse or neglect or are abandoned or homeless and to offer counseling to these children and their families

Human Services
9
Turtle Creek Valley Mental HealthMental Retardation Inc

Providing a continuum of services, care, and support that empowers individuals, families, and communities with behavioral, mental health, substance abuse, and/or developmental issues to sustain their recovery and achieve the important…

Health
10
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Foundation Inc

To support the charitable, educational and other exempt purposes of the indiana united methodist children's home, inc.

Philanthropy
11
Easter Seals Tristate

Empowering children and adults with disabilities, military veterans, and people facing disadvantages to live full and meaningful lives.

Employment
12
Youth Home Inc

To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Evansville Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $46,072 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPURDUE FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONDREAM CENTER OF EVANSVILLE: $14,175 · OtherDREAM CENTER OF EVANSVILLESPECIAL OLYMPICS: $7,100 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS+20 more: $12,078 · Other+20 moreThe Potter's Wheel Inc: $50,500 · ReligionThe Potter's Wheel IncUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc: $10,500 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $550 · Human ServicesHillcrest Washington Youth Home Inc: $4,000 · HealthEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $200 · PhilanthropySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 · Education
Other$111,425Religion$50,500Human Services$11,050Health$4,000Philanthropy$200Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Potter's Wheel Inc: $50,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHillcrest Washington Youth Home Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHadi Shriners: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPatchwork Central Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Potter's Wheel Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Methodist Youth Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hillcrest Washington Youth Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds EVSC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hadi Shriners ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Love FoundationIN15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Love Foundation · Holiday Management Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Tri-State Food Bank · Koch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C · Henry F Koch Residual Trust Co Fifth Third · Kinney Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adam E Naab Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adam E Naab Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adam E Naab’s filings →

    More from the funding graph