Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Action for Life Inc

Action for life promotes, upholds, and supports efforts to protect the sanctity of life from conception to natural death through education, advocacy, and prayer as well as by supporting traditional family values.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Human Services$35kCrime & Legal$19kEducation$17kCivil Rights$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kInternational$10kHealth$8kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $58,840 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $73,181 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,341 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$344k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY$22,170
PATH 2 FREEDOM$19,170
SIDEWALK ADVOCATES FOR LIFE$7,500
AVE MARIA$5,000
THE GIVEN INSTITUTE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ST VINCENT DE PAUL NAPLES DISTRICT COUNCIL: $5k → 10%SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY: $22k → 10%SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69k · 3 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$69k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+1%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • LO
    LAW OF LIFE SUMMIT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k
  • AM
    AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • WO
    WINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -28%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY NAPLES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • AC
    A Community Pregnancy Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

2
Liberty Womens Clinic

Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.

Health
3
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
4
A Womans Haven Inc

To serve women and their unborn babies, who are facing a crisis pregnancy. We do this by encouraging alternatives to abortion through FREE education, counseling, community referrals, and material assistance. We offer these services…

Human Services
5
Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

Pregnancy resource center (prc) exists to prevent abortions and provide eternal truth through evidence based medical services and the gospel of jesus christ.

Health
6
Avenues Pregnancy Clinic

Avenues provides a network of care to those experiencing pregnancy related crisis and compassionately present Biblical truth resulting in changed lives to the glory of God.

Health
7
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
8
Amnion Women's Center

Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
9
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
10
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
11
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
12
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent Depaul Society Naples and the most unlike its peers is PATH2FREEDOM Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY INC — $35,170 · Human ServicesSUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY INCST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY NAPLES — $5,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY NAPLESA Community Pregnancy Center Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesA Community Pregnancy Center IncLAW OF LIFE SUMMIT — $17,000 · OtherLAW OF LIFE SUMMITThe Given Institute Inc — $5,000 · OtherThe Given Institute …PATH2FREEDOM INC — $19,170 · Crime & LegalPATH2FREEDOM INCAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC — $17,000 · EducationAVE MARIA UNIVE…WINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC — $10,000 · InternationalWINGS OF …Sidewalk Advocates for Life — $7,500 · Health
Human Services$45,170Other$22,000Crime & Legal$19,170Education$17,000International$10,000Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY INC — $35,170 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC — $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY NAPLES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Community Pregnancy Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Action for Life Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Ave Maria University Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph