Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Acres of Hope

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Arts & Culture$6kEmployment$5kHuman Services$4kHousing & Shelter$3kYouth Development$3kFood & Nutrition$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$190
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN STATION MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,181
LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ARBOR YOUTH$635
CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN CHURCH$200
BLUEGRASS CHRISTIAN CAMP$190
CATHOLIC ACTION CENTER$190
YOUNG LIFE$180
URBAN IMPACT$127
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$117
COMMON GOOD$100
KERRINGTONS HEARTS INC$58
Individual grant recipient$52
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Revive Ministries Inc: $2k → 12%LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IA
OH
CA
CO
KY
NC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Acres of Hope’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 68% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Acres of Hopelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13k · 6 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$13k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +21%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +18%
  • FW
    FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $717 · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SB
    Sanders Brown Center on Aging
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
2
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
3
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
Linc Up Missions Inc

Linking together people, resources, and churches to reach the remote places of the earth that have little to no evangelical witness.

Religion
6
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
7
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
8
Guidelight Inc

Guidelight exists for the pursuit of Christ-centered transformation in the lives of those impacted by disability through proclaiming biblical truth and providing needed resources.

Human Services
9
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
10
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services
11
Lifechangers Outreach

We are a 12-month residential Christian ministry for men and women ages 18 and up who have drug and alcohol addictions or other life controlling issues. We seek to help men and women overcome those life controlling issues.

Health
12
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLUE GRASS CHRISTIAN CAMP — $2,190 · OtherBLUE GRASS CHRISTIAN CAMPBRYAN STATION MIDDLE SCHOOL — $2,181 · OtherBRYAN STATION MIDDLE SCHOOLSanders Brown Center on Aging — $2,000 · OtherSanders Brown Center on AgingThe Home Depot Foundation — $1,500 · OtherThe Home Depot FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherThe Stone Church — $1,000 · Other+9 more — $2,422 · Other+9 moreLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON LEADERSHI…Revive Ministries Inc — $1,500 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCINCY4UKRAINE — $2,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE — $1,380 · Youth DevelopmentFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION — $717 · HealthHAVE DREAMS — $103 · EmploymentSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $30 · Religion
Other$20,293Arts & Culture$5,500Human Services$2,500Philanthropy$2,000Youth Development$1,380Health$717Employment$103Religion$30

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCINCY4UKRAINE — $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetRevive Ministries Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,380 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION — $717 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAVE DREAMS — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CINCY4UKRAINE
  • Who funds Revive Ministries Inc
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION
  • Who funds HAVE DREAMS
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Acres of Hope funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph