Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Acheson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.1MHealth$114kFood & Nutrition$85kArts & Culture$15kYouth Development$15kAnimals$10kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRANBROOK$50,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$10,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$5,000
CITY YEAR$5,000
BEYOND BASICS$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $3k → 14%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
    5× · 2018–2023 · $185k · revenue +38%
  • CITY YEAR INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +15%
  • IA
    IMERMAN ANGELS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MC
    Math Corps
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +18%
  • CS
    CRANBROOK SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2019 · $36k
  • D
    DPTV
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
6
Detroit Public Schools Foundation

DPSFs mission is to create and enhance educational opportunities for over 50,000 Detroit Public Schools Community Districts students, families and educators. DPS Foundation was organized to ensure DPS, now DPSCD student and families to…

Education
7
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
8
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
9
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
10
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
11
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
12
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wish Upon a Teen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $575,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYCITY YEAR INC — $86,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCCRANBROOK — $50,000 · OtherCRANBROOKCRANBROOK SCHOOLS — $35,500 · Other+9 more — $83,500 · Other+9 moreCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $185,000 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMU…Math Corps — $100,000 · EducationMath CorpsEton Academy — $18,500 · EducationEton AcademyBEYOND BASICS — $15,500 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $85,000 · Food & NutritionIMERMAN ANGELS — $71,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $10,000 · HealthBRILLIANT DETROIT — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWISH UPON A TEEN — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $3,100 · Human ServicesDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $10,000 · Animals
Other$830,000Education$329,000Food & Nutrition$85,000Health$81,000Youth Development$16,000Human Services$13,100Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMath Corps — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $86,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS — $71,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetEton Academy — $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BASICS — $15,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISH UPON A TEEN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
  • Who funds Math Corps
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS
  • Who funds Eton Academy
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds WISH UPON A TEEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Acheson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Acheson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Acheson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph