Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Accion Opportunity Fund Inc

Accion opportunity fund.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$5.5MEmployment$60k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$1,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$1,000,000
LEARN WITH AOF FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $35k → 20%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 7 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$5.5M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+63%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +198%
  • AI
    ASCENDUS INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +32%
  • D
    DREAMSPRING
    2× · 2017–2018 · $970k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • P
    PEOPLEFUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fresno Community Development Financial Institution dba Access Plus Capital

Access plus capital is nonprofit small business lender and service provider with the mission to eliminate economic barriers to financial success through fair and equitable community investment.

Public Benefit
2
Acc Capital Inc

Acc capital is a private nonprofit financial leader on a mission for economic change. we are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs and uplifting communities with accessible loans, resources, and over 68 years of experience.

3
Axiom Advancement Corporation

We exist to level the playing field in small business lending through our commitment to fair lending laws, accountability to the communities we serve and by implementing industry best practices.

Community Improvement
4
Access Community Capital

To provide low-cost loans to underserved small businesses encouraging community and economic development.

Community Improvement
5
Womenventure

To empower women to achieve their economic goals by building profitable and sustainable businesses that transform communities.

Community Improvement
6
Colorado Enterprise Fund

To accelerate community prosperity by financing and supporting entrepreneurs and small businesses.

Community Improvement
7
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
8
Working Solutions Cdfi

Working solutions cdfi is the first to believe in start-up and early-stage businesses by providing diverse entrepreneurs with affordable capital, customized business consulting, and community connections to increase economic opportunity in…

Human Services
9
Brooklyn Alliance Capital Inc

The brooklyn alliance capital, inc. is a micro-loan institution and provides loans to small businesses (specifically immigrant and minority owned).

Public Benefit
10
Womens Center for Economic Opportunity

Our mission is to elevate & empower under-resourced business owners, leaders and innovators with pathways to the capital customers, contracts and connections needed to become financially secure

Education
11
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
12
Northeast Entrepreneur Fund Inc

The mission of entrepreneur fund is to advance community economic development in rural and underserved communities. we work to achieve this by actively partnering with entrepreneurs to stimulate the growth of successful businesses. our…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accion Opportunity Fund Community Development and the most unlike its peers is Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $1,553,190 · Community ImprovementACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTASCENDUS INC — $1,253,642 · Community ImprovementASCENDUS INCDREAMSPRING — $970,152 · Community ImprovementDREAMSPRINGALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $919,902 · Community ImprovementALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INCACCESSITY — $649,075 · Community ImprovementACCESSITY+1 more — $25,000 · Community ImprovementHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $60,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC — $50,000 · EmploymentLEARN WITH AOF FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Education
Community Improvement$5,370,961Human Services$60,000Employment$50,000Education$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $1,553,190 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetASCENDUS INC — $1,253,642 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetDREAMSPRING — $970,152 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $919,902 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetACCESSITY — $649,075 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLEARN WITH AOF FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetPEOPLEFUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Opportunity Finance NetworkDC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Opportunity Finance Network · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Great Rivers Community Trust · The Gina Harman Family Foundation Inc · Citi Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Wells Fargo Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Accion Opportunity Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Center for Women & Enterprise Inc27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph