Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Access

To provide assistance to low-income individuals and families.

$35M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Housing & Shelter$22MHuman Services$13MReligion$424kFood & Nutrition$277kCrime & Legal$104kYouth Development$94kCommunity Improvement$22kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $10,481,281 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $34,822,926 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,341,645 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $445k
  • $250k+7 grants · $9.9M
$258,326
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROGUE RETREAT$3,560,429
OPTIONS FOR HELPING RESIDENTS$3,119,300
UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$1,541,133
OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION$764,779
COMMUNITY WORKS$382,097
MASLOW PROJECT$316,850
UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER$258,326
SALVATION ARMY$232,236
THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY$156,266
RESOLVE$56,450
HEARTS WITH A MISSION$39,083
ONTRACK INC$28,212
GOLDEN RULE$26,120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $1.5M → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $1.2M → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $1.1M → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $994k → 17%UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER: $258k → 13%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $793k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $511k → 17%UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER: $222k → 13%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $467k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $361k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWO: $245k → 17%THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $156k → 13%UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER: $56k → 13%UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER: $53k → 13%UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER: $51k → 13%GOLDEN RULE: $31k → 13%GOLDEN RULE: $26k → 13%ROGUE VALLEY YMCA: $15k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $6k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $83k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $71k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $63k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $50k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $40k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $39k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $29k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $15k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 15 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$32M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
-13%

Still filing today

87%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7.7M · revenue ×16 · 47% of their budget
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.2M · revenue +81%
  • RR
    ROGUE RETREAT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +555%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MEDFORD
    one grant, 2024 · $3.0M
  • CO
    CITY OF ASHLAND
    one grant, 2024 · $1.2M
  • PH
    PEACE HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $42k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Places of Change

Resource for housing and other essential needs

Housing & Shelter
2
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
3
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
4
Refugee Care Collective Northwest

Provide care to refugee families.

Human Services
5
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
6
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
7
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
8
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
9
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Volunteers of America of Oregon Inc

Volunteers of america changes lives by promoting self-determination, building strong communities and standing for social justice.

—
12
Snoqualmie Valley Shelter Services

Reclaim is a community resource providing pathways to stability, opportunity & connection.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natives of One Wind Indigenous Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND — $7,730,030 · Housing & ShelterOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES ANDOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION — $5,102,991 · Housing & ShelterOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTIONUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $7,201,527 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NE…NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE — $640,563 · Human ServicesNATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGE…HEARTS WITH A MISSION — $404,208 · Human Services+4 more — $233,882 · Human ServicesROGUE RETREAT — $5,685,937 · HealthROGUE RETREATCOMMUNITY WORKS INC — $972,908 · HealthCOMMUNITY WORKS INCCITY OF MEDFORD — $3,029,780 · OtherCITY OF MEDFORDCITY OF ASHLAND — $1,158,200 · OtherCITY OF ASHLANDROGUE VALLEY VETERANS AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $1,000,323 · OtherROGUE VALLEY VETER…THE SALVATION ARMY — $424,203 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYONTRACK INC — $201,939 · Other+4 more — $122,255 · OtherMASLOW PROJECT — $1,190,970 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY — $732,910 · EducationPEACE HOUSE — $41,762 · EducationRESOLVE CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION & RESTORATIVE JUSTICE — $103,967 · Crime & Legal
Housing & Shelter$12,833,021Human Services$8,480,180Health$6,658,845Other$5,936,700Youth Development$1,190,970Education$774,672Crime & Legal$103,967

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND — $7,730,030 over 7y, 47% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK — $7,201,527 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetROGUE RETREAT — $5,685,937 over 9y, 11% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION — $5,102,991 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT — $1,190,970 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetROGUE VALLEY VETERANS AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $1,000,323 over 3y, 56% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKS INC — $972,908 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY — $732,910 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetNATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE — $640,563 over 5y, 16% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION — $404,208 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetONTRACK INC — $201,939 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRESOLVE CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION & RESTORATIVE JUSTICE — $103,967 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetROGUE VALLEY FOOD SYSTEM NETWORK — $83,369 over 2y, 49% of budgetGOLDEN RULE REENTRY — $56,676 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetPEACE HOUSE — $41,762 over 1y, 14% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA — $14,540 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK — $6,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carpenter Foundat…The Oregon Community …Carrico Family Founda…United Way of Jackson…Anna May Family Found…OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Roundhouse Founda…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Ford Family Found…Careoregon IncThe Collins FoundationThe Leightman Maxey F…
The Carpenter FoundationOR34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · United Way of Jackson County Inc · Anna May Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · The Leightman Maxey Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Access funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • The Arc Jackson County — 87% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Community Action — 85% of income from government
  • United Community Action Network — 82% of income from government
  • Community Volunteer Network — 59% of income from government
  • Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Hearts With a Mission — 51% of income from government
  • Golden Rule Reentry — 47% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
  • Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
  • Ontrack Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home