Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abrams Foundation Inc Abrams

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$162kHuman Services$74kRecreation & Sports$73kEducation$55kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$14kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$616k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE KEHILLAT CHAIM$19,500
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$8,000
FAMILIES FIRST$5,000
UNION OF REFORM JUDAISM$4,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$4,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$3,000
THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION$2,000
THE CARTER CENTER$1,500
ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,500
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$1,500
HISTORIC OAKLAND FOUNDATION$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
THE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HOME$1,000
ATLANTA JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
SCOUTS SANDY SPRINGS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILIES FIRST: $10k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $10k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $10k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $10k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $5k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $5k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $5k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $5k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$374k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+321%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +50%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +38%
  • HO
    Historic Oakland Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • EW
    ED WHITTINGTON CHARITABLE TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +321%
  • HC
    HAMBRIDGE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emory University

Emory University's mission is to create, preserve, teach, and apply knowledge in the service of humanity. (See Schedule O for continuation)

Education
2
Jewish Family & Career Services Inc

To transform lives.

Human Services
3
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
4
The Georgetown Trust
Education
5
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
10
Atlanta Historical Society Inc

Atlanta history center seeks to connect people, history, and culture to build a stronger community. through exhibitions, collections, historic houses, gardens, archives, educational school tours, public programs, and digital and virtual…

Arts & Culture
11
John Jay Institute for Faith Society and Law Inc

To prepare principled leaders for faith-informed public service.

Religion
12
The Goldman Sachs Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families First Inc; the most unlike its peers is Scouts Sandy Springs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEHILLAT CHAIM INC: $140,250 · OtherKEHILLAT CHAIM INCEMORY UNIVERSITY: $41,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITYTHE TEMPLE: $13,650 · OtherATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $13,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $13,500 · OtherHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc: $13,000 · Other+9 more: $34,010 · Other+9 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $73,000 · EducationUniversity of Not…FAMILIES FIRST INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST I…ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $19,500 · Food & NutritionTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $13,500 · InternationalThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc: $9,000 · HealthASCENSA HEALTH INC: $2,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $9,000 · Philanthropy
Other$268,910Education$73,000Human Services$65,000Food & Nutrition$19,500International$13,500Health$11,000Philanthropy$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $73,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $65,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASCENSA HEALTH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetED WHITTINGTON CHARITABLE TRUST: $1,010 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The William Breman Jewish Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSA HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ED WHITTINGTON CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SCOUTS SANDY SPRINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrams Foundation Inc Abrams funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrams Foundation Inc Abrams. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abrams Foundation Inc Abrams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph