· Public charity
Abny Foundation Inc
The abny foundation, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $117,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $142,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $98k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DESIGN TRUST FOR PUBLIC SPACE | $10,000 |
| THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC | $10,000 |
| PUBLIC HOUSING COMMUNITY FUND | $7,500 |
| ANDROMEDA COMMUNITY INITIATIVE | $7,500 |
| THE ACCELERATION PROJECT (TAP) | $7,500 |
| THE INSPIRED COMMUNITY PROJECT | $7,500 |
| MANHATTAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| WELCOME TO CHINATOWN | $7,500 |
| GREEN CITY FORCE (GCF) | $7,500 |
| BANGLADESHI AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND YOUTH SERVICES (BACDYS) | $7,500 |
| URBAN JUSTICE CENTER | $7,500 |
| FORT GREENE PARK CONSERVANCY | $7,500 |
| UPTOWN GRAND CENTRAL | $7,500 |
| URBAN DOVE | $7,500 |
| TRUST FOR GOVERNORS ISLAND | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE URBAN DOVE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +82%
REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue +9%- ACANDROMEDA COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -3%
- GJGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue 0%
- NYNEW YORK CARES INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.
Our mission is to promote and protect affordable homeownership in new york so that middle- and working-class families are able to build strong, thriving communities.
Promote workforce development and job creation through activities specifically designed to create skilled workforce in the City of New York.
New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…
Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…
Unite, advance, and strengthen nyc's diverse and global design community for the sake of marketing and fast description.
Open plans' mission is to transform how people experience new york city's streets. open plans uses grassroots advocacy and policy change to inspire structural reforms and cultural shifts. we promote a people-first street culture that…
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for Public Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE URBAN DOVE INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANDROMEDA COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR NEW YORKS STRONGEST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds QUEENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GRACE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CORO NEW YORK LEADERSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds DESIGN TRUST FOR PUBLIC SPACE INC ↗
- Who funds JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Bike New York Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FORT GREENE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL MUSIC GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY TOURISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Welcome To Chinatown Inc ↗
- Who funds UPTOWN GRAND CENTRAL CORP ↗
- Who funds KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds 100 SUITS FOR 100 MEN ↗
- Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N ↗
- Who funds FIORELLO H LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn District Management Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds KINDWORK INC ↗
- Who funds 21 In 21 Inc ↗
- Who funds Riverside Language Program Inc ↗
- Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Pinkerton Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · The Realty Foundation of New York Inc · The Ford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abny Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.