Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abernathy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$51kHealth$39kPhilanthropy$21kReligion$15kHuman Services$12kAnimals$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON ADVANCEMENT$25,000
HUGH M HEFNER FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$6,791
SUGAR LAND METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
CAMP KESEM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
PARKS YOUTH RANCH$2,500
FAMILY SERVICE CENTER$2,068
STEM BRIDGES HOUSTON$2,000
WHITE RIBBON PROJECT$2,000
ROSENBERG-RICHMOND HELPING HANDS INC$2,000
PROJECT HOPE RECOVERY CENTER$2,000
TEXAS EQUUSEARCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $5k → 14%WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $13k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 10 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$108k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • CK
    Camp Kesem National
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +25%
  • TE
    TEXAS EQUUSEARCH MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • WF
    WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +3%
  • FM
    FIRST METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • AC
    A Cause to Give Us Paws
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
2
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

—
3
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
4
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
5
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

—
6
Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues rehabilitates and rehomes abandoned injured and at risk animals in the Alvin and Greater Houston region providing medical care safe foster placement community education and adoption services to promote humane…

Animals
7
Animal Friends of Port Aransas Inc

Provide veterinary and shelter services for displaced and wayward animals in the township and outlying area of port aransas, texas.

Animals
8
Red Collar Rescue Inc

RED COLLAR RESCUE is an all-volunteer 501 (c) (3) animal welfare charity dedicated to rescuing and providing extensive medical care, foster care, training, rehabilitation, and adoptive placement to stray, abandoned, and abused dogs in…

Animals
9
River Run Ranch and Animal Rescue

Animal Rescue

Animals
10
Paws of Austin Protection of Animal Welfare Services

PAWS' purpose is to provide refuge to stray and unwanted animals. PAWS' mission is to prevent cruelty to all animals by promoting humane standards through education and example, to provide care and shelter for homeless animals, aid in the…

Animals
11
Purple Paws 2nd Chance Rescue
Animals
12
Paws Houston

The mission of PAWS Houston is to help sustain relationships between pet owners and their pets through a period of the owner's terminal and/or chronic illness in the hospital, hospice and at home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Fort Bend County; the most unlike its peers is Hugh M Hefner Foundation Co Amanda Warren. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON ADVANCEMENT: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON ADVANCEMENTHUGH M HEFNER FOUNDATION CO AMANDA WARREN: $20,000 · OtherHUGH M HEFNER FOUNDATION CO AMANDA WARRENFIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherFIRST METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $8,791 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,155 · OtherSUGAR LAND METHODIST CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $4,136 · Other+15 more: $17,777 · Other+15 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,258 · HealthAmerican Hear…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…THE WHITE RIBBON PROJECT INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE WHITE RIB…WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $12,801 · Human ServicesWHEELCHAIRS …Camp Kesem National: $7,059 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem N…A Cause to Give Us Paws: $5,125 · AnimalsFort Bend Paws: $1,500 · AnimalsA PLACE FOR PEANUT INC: $750 · AnimalsHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $750 · AnimalsTEXAS EQUUSEARCH MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY: $6,459 · Public Safety & DisasterPARKS YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterSUGAR LAND LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,400 · PhilanthropyNAMI GREATER HOUSTON: $100 · PhilanthropyCREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER INC: $225 · Arts & Culture
Other$121,859Health$22,258Human Services$19,860Animals$8,125Public Safety & Disaster$6,459Housing & Shelter$2,500Philanthropy$1,500Arts & Culture$225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUGH M HEFNER FOUNDATION CO AMANDA WARREN: $20,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetWHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $12,801 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,258 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $7,059 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS EQUUSEARCH MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY: $6,459 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetA Cause to Give Us Paws: $5,125 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPARKS YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WHITE RIBBON PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetROSENBERG RICHMOND HELPING HANDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFort Bend Paws: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUGAR LAND LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,400 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF FORT BEND COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER INC: $225 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI GREATER HOUSTON: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUGH M HEFNER FOUNDATION CO AMANDA WARREN ↗
  • Who funds WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS EQUUSEARCH MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds A Cause to Give Us Paws ↗
  • Who funds PARKS YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WHITE RIBBON PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSENBERG RICHMOND HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Fort Bend Paws ↗
  • Who funds SUGAR LAND LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF FORT BEND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE FOR PEANUT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI GREATER HOUSTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Henderson-Wessendorff Foundation · The George Foundation · Fred and Mabel R Parks Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abernathy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abernathy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Abernathy Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Abernathy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abernathy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph