Skip to content
Abba T Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Abba T Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$132kReligion$118kHousing & Shelter$41kHealth$40kEducation$7kInternational$2k
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$8,490
MERCY MULTIPLIED$5,000
COVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES$5,000
MISSION PREBORN$3,000
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$1,000
WHEELER MISSION$500
IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER$500
SUNLIGHT HOMES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSION PREBORN: $16k → 16%MISSION PREBORN: $12k → 16%MISSION PREBORN: $3k → 16%MISSION PREBORN: $2k → 16%MISSION PREBORN: $2k → 16%MISSION PREBORN: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $6k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $6k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $4k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $500 → 16%IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER: $3k → 10%IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER: $2k → 10%IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER: $1k → 10%IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$290k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+169%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthReligionCivil RightsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +10%
  • MP
    Mission Pre-Born Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $36k · revenue +960%
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $23k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • PO
    PRC OF SOUTHWEST FLORDIA
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • DO
    DAUGHTERS OF DESTINY
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • LC
    Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +169%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
2
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
3
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
4
The Pregnancy Center

The Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry providing alternatives to abortion, and support programs committed to saving lives physically, spiritually, and emotionally, one life at a time for the glory of God.

Human Services
5
Pregnancy Crisis Center Inc

To share the gospel of jesus christ by offering practical, emotional, and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy & abortion related concerns

Human Services
6
Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource Center

The mission of hope pregnancy resource center is to reach out in love with life affirming services that empower parents to choose life for their unborn babies. our christ-centered ministry strives to bring about an abortion free community…

—
7
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
8
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
9
Hope for Life Pregnancy Center of Charles City Iowa

Hope for life pregnancy center is a christ-centered, pro-life ministry, committed to sharing the good news of jesus christ and upholding the sanctity of life by providing compassionate, life-affirming services to women, men, and families…

Human Services
10
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
11
Pregnancy Resource Center of Stanly County Inc

The organization is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life. the prc has pregnancy & ultrasound testing along with christian counseling on parenting skills and abstinence.

—
12
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Multiplied America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Healing Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES: $91,200 · OtherCOVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLESMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC: $80,000 · OtherMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INCPRC OF SOUTHWEST FLORDIA: $15,000 · OtherPRC OF SOUTHWEST FLORDIADAUGHTERS OF DESTINY: $13,672 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF DESTINY+10 more: $20,900 · Other+10 moreMission Pre-Born Inc: $36,000 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born IncWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSION MINI…IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesIMMOKALEE PREGNANCY …PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $23,490 · Civil RightsST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $17,988 · Housing & ShelterLife Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $11,000 · HealthChristian Healing Center Inc: $5,000 · ReligionPLACE OF HOPE IN HAITI INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$220,772Human Services$61,000Civil Rights$23,490Housing & Shelter$17,988Health$11,000Religion$5,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $36,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $23,490 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $17,988 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLife Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetIMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetChristian Healing Center Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE IN HAITI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Healing Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE IN HAITI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abba T Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abba T Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abba T’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home