Skip to content

· Private foundation

A2 Ministries

TO BUILD AN ORGANIZATION THAT CAN TRAIN, EQUIP, INSPIRE AND DEVELOP THE SKILLS OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS GLOBALLY, PARTICULARLY IN THE UNDER-RESOURCED WORLD.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$376kPhilanthropy$33kReligion$16kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$5kCivil Rights$5kEducation$4kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$3,899
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUESTSCOPE$76,500
THE TELOS GROUP$14,000
BETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE$11,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PARENTS CIRCLE$8,753
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE$5,050
NONVIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL$4,120
HOLY APOSTLES$4,000
HIKMA HEALTH$3,899
DOUGLAS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$3,082
Individual grant recipient$2,238
FRIENDS OF TENT OF NATIONS NORTH AMERICA$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,010
MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS$1,000
VELO KIDS INC$354
CHANGEORG$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524k · 10 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$524k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
-19%

Still filing today

40%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QL
    QUESTSCOPE LTD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $339k · revenue +20%
  • TG
    Telos Group Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +116%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION
    one grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue -76%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • TT
    THE TELOS GROUP
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
KIDS4PEACE International Inc

Kids4Peace is a grassroots, interfaith peace organization dedicated to ending conflict and inspiring hope in Jerusalem and other divided societies around the world, through summer camps and year-round programs. Kids4Peace builds trust,…

—
2
Alliance for Middle East Peace Inc

The alliance for middle east peace (allmep) leads a network of 200+ civil society organizations working to create the conditions for security, peace, and freedom for both israelis and palestinians. our member ngos build trust,…

Arts & Culture
3
Catalyst for Peace
Philanthropy
4
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
5
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
6
Friends of Amal-Tikva Inc

None

International
7
Friends Peace Teams Inc

Friends Peace Teams is a Spirit-led organization working around the world to develop long-term relationships with communities in conflict to create programs for peace building, healing & reconciliation based on extensive Quaker experience.

International
8
Hope of Peace Foundation

The mission of hope of peace foundation is to promote peace and harmony by building bridges between palestinians and israelis, through programs that bring hope and tangible change both to individuals and communities.

Philanthropy
9
Pax Christi Usa

The promotion of peace and justice.

—
10
Physicians for Palestine
Health
11
The African Middle Eastern Leadership Project

The african middle eastern leadership project's mission is to mobilize, empower, and unite young leaders and activists from the middle east and africa to build resilient, inclusive societies that are free from discrimination, persecution,…

Youth Development
12
International Interfaith Peace Corp

To Facilitate Coexistence globally by promoting and rewarding collaborative work in the preservation and promotion of life, based on compassion. To encourage and assist people of all orientations to become true vicegerents of God on earth.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Telos Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Preemptive Love Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

QUESTSCOPE LTD: $339,280 · InternationalQUESTSCOPE LTDTelos Group Inc: $34,000 · InternationalTelos Group IncIndividual grant recipient: $65,605 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $15,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NAZARENEBETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE: $14,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PARENTS CIRCLE: $13,753 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PARENTS CIRC…THE TELOS GROUP: $10,000 · OtherTHE TELOS GROUPIndividual grant recipient: $7,478 · OtherNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $7,210 · Other+17 more: $42,961 · Other+17 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $33,450 · PhilanthropyUrban Alliance Inc: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $21,630 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $5,050 · EducationLiving Stones Academy: $500 · EducationMICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $1,000 · Human ServicesVELO KIDS INC: $354 · Recreation & Sports
International$373,280Other$176,007Philanthropy$35,450Health$21,630Education$5,550Human Services$1,000Recreation & Sports$354

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQUESTSCOPE LTD: $339,280 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetTelos Group Inc: $34,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $33,450 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $21,630 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $7,210 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIKMA HEALTH INC: $3,899 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUrban Alliance Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Stones Academy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUESTSCOPE LTD ↗
  • Who funds Telos Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM ↗
  • Who funds THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIKMA HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Urban Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds Living Stones Academy ↗
  • Who funds VELO KIDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A2 Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A2 Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A2 Ministries?

    Find your warmest path to A2 Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A2 Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph