· Private foundation
A2 Ministries
TO BUILD AN ORGANIZATION THAT CAN TRAIN, EQUIP, INSPIRE AND DEVELOP THE SKILLS OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS GLOBALLY, PARTICULARLY IN THE UNDER-RESOURCED WORLD.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| QUESTSCOPE | $58,360 |
| CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE | $15,000 |
| THE TELOS GROUP | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,240 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PARENTS CIRCLE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| NONVIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL | $3,090 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,090 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,010 |
| IMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH | $3,000 |
| BETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE | $3,000 |
| DOUGLAS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST | $2,500 |
| REFUGEE FUND | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| URBAN ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against -76% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- QLQUESTSCOPE LTD5× · 2020–2024 · $263k · revenue +20%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +211%
- TGTelos Group Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- TPTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITIONone grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue -76%
- SESOUTH EAST MARKET LLCone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bring outstanding Israeli and Palestinian young adults to Washington DC to live and work together and develop leadership skills to be able to to advocate for a shared future together.
The mission of hope of peace foundation is to promote peace and harmony by building bridges between palestinians and israelis, through programs that bring hope and tangible change both to individuals and communities.
To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically by developing and delivering outstanding, life changing resources, training, and services to a multitude of receptive churches throughtout the world.
Friends Peace Teams is a Spirit-led organization working around the world to develop long-term relationships with communities in conflict to create programs for peace building, healing and reconciliations based on extensive Quaker…
Partners in Jewish Life Inc. is dedicated to inspiring a lifelong connection to Judaism through meaningful learning personal relationships and community engagement. The organization creates transformative Jewish educational experiences for…
The organization conducts participatory research and evaluation in partnership with communities affected by conflict.
We protect civilians in violent conflicts through unarmed strategies.
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
To advance a balanced and realistic understanding of american interests in the middle east.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Hope Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Preemptive Love Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A2 Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A2 Ministries?
Find your warmest path to A2 Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.