· Private foundation
Julietta Jarvis Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $356k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $116k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TYLER MUSEUM OF ART | $65,500 |
| TROUP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL SYSTEM | $50,000 |
| TYLER ROSE MUSEUM | $45,000 |
| BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC | $40,000 |
| HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS | $35,000 |
| EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK | $30,000 |
| HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION - TYLER | $27,500 |
| EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER | $20,000 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $20,000 |
| HISTORIC TYLER | $20,000 |
| SMITH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| PATH | $12,500 |
| CAMP TYLER FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS6× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +32%
- TTTHE TYLER ROSE MUSEUM INC7× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +150% · 31% of their budget
- BHBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC6× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +286%
Funded once
- H8HIWAY 80 MISSIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
- TATEXAS AM UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $3k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSASone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Historical education - provide historical education through the preservation, restoration, and operation of historical structures, support historical research, and exhibit historic relics.
Support economic development of greater tyler area.
Preservation and education of history and historical items of interest for the citizens and visitors of sherman, tx.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The Taylor County History Center exists to encourage and promote exhibits, publications, and activities of educational, historical, and social interest and benefit regarding Texas frontier history, with a focus on Taylor County and the…
The mission of tulia child development center is to provide child day care-weekday child care for children from 6 weeks to 12 years old.
1.serving the city of tyler, smith county, and surrounding areas in the rescue and adoption of homeless animals. 2. promoting and educating our community regarding the serious need for reduction of local pet overpopulation and lowering…
The organization and maintenance of an historical museum depicting the life and times of early southwest texas and mexico residents.
To provide primary health and dental care to the underserved of fayette and lee counties, texas.
The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Tyler Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TYLER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE TYLER ROSE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC TYLER INC ↗
- Who funds SMITH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KOURAGE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP ↗
- Who funds Tyler Civic Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP TYLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds TYLER DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: A S Genecov Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Bg Byars Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · Hoeffner Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · Byers Family Foundation · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Julietta Jarvis Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Julietta Jarvis Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Julietta Jarvis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.