Skip to content

· Private foundation

A R K a Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2023
29
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$152kArts & Culture$122kEducation$105kCommunity Improvement$101kPhilanthropy$61kPublic Benefit$60kHuman Services$41kInternational$40kOther$0
02FY2023 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k24 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF ART (LACMA)$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
FIDF$10,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
STAND WITH US$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
SHELTER PARTNERSHIP$7,500
HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO$3,600
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$2,650
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,500
LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME$2,500
BEIT T'SHUVAH$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
SOJOURNER CENTER$2,500
ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDHELP: $2k → 11%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
CA
WV
VA
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of A R K a Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 0%.

A R K a Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$732k · 52 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2023, 30 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
19

Total granted

$732k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+53%

Still filing today

46%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $97k · revenue +60%
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $50k · revenue +89%
  • SP
    SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
7
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
8
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
9
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
10
Los Angeles Police Foundation

The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)

Human Services
11
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
12
Beyond Us & Them

To offer programs and training that resource individuals and organizations in self-awareness, self-regulation, effective communication and to promote structures of belonging, utilizing council and other practices, to encourage social…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sojourner Center; the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $100,581 · OtherCITY OF HOPEUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $97,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOCITY OF HOPE BOARD OF GOVERNORS: $50,454 · OtherCITY OF HOPE BOARD OF GOVERNORSMUSEUM OF ART (LACMA): $50,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF ART (LACMA)TGEN FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherTGEN FOUNDATIONCEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORS: $37,500 · OtherCEDARS SINAI BOARD OF GOVERNORSFIDF: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+52 more: $247,885 · Other+52 moreMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $2,750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $850 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $20,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $15,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · InternationalSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterEisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthWIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED: $5,000 · HealthThe Rand Corporation: $15,000 · Public BenefitSOJOURNER CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesLANGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$679,420Arts & Culture$68,600International$40,000Housing & Shelter$27,000Health$20,000Public Benefit$15,000Human Services$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $97,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $9,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $5,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLuv of dogz fund: $2,900 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICERS ASSN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA BEAGLE RESCUE: $1,250 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WIGGLE YOUR TOES INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Steven Lawrence Kaplan FoundationCA24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A R K a Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A R K a Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A R K a Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to A R K a Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A R K a Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph